Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38264497›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

SHIP: a computational framework for simulating and validating novel technologies in hardware spiking neural networks.

Emanuele Gemo, Sabina Spiga, Stefano Brivio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emanuele GemoCNR-IMM, Unit of Agrate Brianza, Agrate Brianza, Italy.
Sabina SpigaCNR-IMM, Unit of Agrate Brianza, Agrate Brianza, Italy.
Stefano BrivioCNR-IMM, Unit of Agrate Brianza, Agrate Brianza, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigations in the field of spiking neural networks (SNNs) encompass diverse, yet overlapping, scientific disciplines. Examples range from purely neuroscientific investigations, researches on computational aspects of neuroscience, or applicative-oriented studies aiming to improve SNNs performance or to develop artificial hardware counterparts. However, the simulation of SNNs is a complex task that can not be adequately addressed with a single platform applicable to all scenarios. The optimization of a simulation environment to meet specific metrics often entails compromises in other aspects. This computational challenge has led to an apparent dichotomy of approaches, with model-driven algorithms dedicated to the detailed simulation of biological networks, and data-driven algorithms designed for efficient processing of large input datasets. Nevertheless, material scientists, device physicists, and neuromorphic engineers who develop new technologies for spiking neuromorphic hardware solutions would find benefit in a simulation environment that borrows aspects from both approaches, thus facilitating modeling, analysis, and training of prospective SNN systems. This manuscript explores the numerical challenges deriving from the simulation of spiking neural networks, and introduces SHIP, Spiking (neural network) Hardware In PyTorch, a numerical tool that supports the investigation and/or validation of materials, devices, small circuit blocks within SNN architectures. SHIP facilitates the algorithmic definition of the models for the components of a network, the monitoring of states and output of the modeled systems, and the training of the synaptic weights of the network, by way of user-defined unsupervised learning rules or supervised training techniques derived from conventional machine learning. SHIP offers a valuable tool for researchers and developers in the field of hardware-based spiking neural networks, enabling efficient simulation and validation of novel technologies.

Indexed as

compact modeldata flowneuromorphic engineeringsimulation platformsspiking neural networksupervised trainingtemporal progress

Identifiers

PMID38264497
PMCPMC10804805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.