Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38264495›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Revealing brain connectivity: graph embeddings for EEG representation learning and comparative analysis of structural and functional connectivity.

Abdullah Almohammadi, Yu-Kai Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abdullah AlmohammadiSchool of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Yu-Kai WangSchool of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study employs deep learning techniques to present a compelling approach for modeling brain connectivity in EEG motor imagery classification through graph embedding. The compelling aspect of this study lies in its combination of graph embedding, deep learning, and different brain connectivity types, which not only enhances classification accuracy but also enriches the understanding of brain function. The approach yields high accuracy, providing valuable insights into brain connections and has potential applications in understanding neurological conditions. The proposed models consist of two distinct graph-based convolutional neural networks, each leveraging different types of brain connectivities to enhance classification performance and gain a deeper understanding of brain connections. The first model, Adjacency-based Convolutional Neural Network Model (Adj-CNNM), utilizes a graph representation based on structural brain connectivity to embed spatial information, distinguishing it from prior spatial filtering approaches dependent on subjects and tasks. Extensive tests on a benchmark dataset-IV-2a demonstrate that an accuracy of 72.77% is achieved by the Adj-CNNM, surpassing baseline and state-of-the-art methods. The second model, Phase Locking Value Convolutional Neural Network Model (PLV-CNNM), incorporates functional connectivity to overcome structural connectivity limitations and identifies connections between distinct brain regions. The PLV-CNNM achieves an overall accuracy of 75.10% across the 1-51 Hz frequency range. In the preferred 8-30 Hz frequency band, known for motor imagery data classification (including α, μ, and β waves), individual accuracies of 91.9%, 90.2%, and 85.8% are attained for α, μ, and β, respectively. Moreover, the model performs admirably with 84.3% accuracy when considering the entire 8-30 Hz band. Notably, the PLV-CNNM reveals robust connections between different brain regions during motor imagery tasks, including the frontal and central cortex and the central and parietal cortex. These findings provide valuable insights into brain connectivity patterns, enriching the comprehension of brain function. Additionally, the study offers a comprehensive comparative analysis of diverse brain connectivity modeling methods.

Indexed as

adjacency matrixbrain connectivityfunctional connectivityGraph Convolutional Neural NetworkMI-EEGmotor imageryPLVstructural connectivity

Identifiers

PMID38264495
PMCPMC10804888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.