ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Modified Lip Repositioning Surgery with and without Dual-layered Suturing for Treatment of Gummy Smile Patients.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lip Repositioning Surgery for Nonskeletal Excessive Gingival Display: A Clinical Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Comparison between the surgical scalpel and carbon dioxide laser in managing excessive gingival display using lip repositioning technique: a randomized controlled clinical study.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
- A Review of Current Techniques in Lip Reposition Surgery for Treating Excessive Gingival Display.Cureus · 2024Review
- Esthetic Crown Lengthening Associated With Modified Lip Repositioning Surgery (Modified LipStat) in the Treatment of Excessive Gingival Display: A 6-Year Follow-Up Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The present study was performed to evaluate the differences in the efficacy of treating excessive gingival display with the standard modified lip repositioning surgery or the modified lip repositioning surgery with dual-layered suturing. Methods: This study included 20 female patients who had a gummy smile resulting from upper lip hypermobility or short upper lip. Preoperative measurements of the amount of gum exposure were taken during involuntary smiling. The patients were randomly divided into two groups; the first group was treated with the standard technique, whereas the second group was treated with the double-layered suturing method. All patients were followed up at 14 days, 3 months, and 6 months; postoperative assessment was done by measuring the changes in the gingival display during spontaneous smiling. Results: Postoperative measurements at 14 days follow-up showed a significant reduction in the amount of gingival exposure in both groups. However, at 3 months, there was a complete relapse for the first group of patients, whereas the second group showed a slight regain in the amount of gum exposure, though the latter group showed a complete relapse at 6 months postoperative. Conclusions: The dual-layered suturing for the modified lip repositioning surgery did not provide any long-term improvement for treating gummy smile patients; however, it did delay the relapse to a certain extent for the first 3 months postoperative in some of the patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.