Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38264292›Full record

ArticleJournal of statistical planning and inference2024

Distributed eQTL analysis with auxiliary information.

Zhiwen Fang, Gen Li, Wendong Li, Xiaolong Pu, Dongdong Xiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of statistical planning and inference, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhiwen FangKLATASDS-MOE, School of Statistics, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Gen LiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Wendong LiSchool of Statistics and Management, Shanghai Institute of International Finance and Economics, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.
Xiaolong PuKLATASDS-MOE, School of Statistics, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Dongdong XiangKLATASDS-MOE, School of Statistics, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

Tensor Array Methods for RNA-Seq AnalysisR01HG010731 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LI, GEN · 2020 to 2024
$1.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis is a useful tool to identify genetic loci that are associated with gene expression levels. Large collaborative efforts such as the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project provide valuable resources for eQTL analysis in different tissues. Most existing methods, however, either focus on one tissue at a time, or analyze multiple tissues to identify eQTLs jointly present in multiple tissues. There is a lack of powerful methods to identify eQTLs in a target tissue while effectively borrowing strength from auxiliary tissues. In this paper, we propose a novel statistical framework to improve the eQTL detection efficacy in the tissue of interest with auxiliary information from other tissues. This framework can enhance the power of the hypothesis test for eQTL effects by incorporating shared and specific effects from multiple tissues into the test statistics. We also devise data-driven and distributed computing approaches for efficient implementation of eQTL detection when the number of tissues is large. Numerical studies in simulation demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method, and the real data analysis of the GTEx example provides novel insights into eQTL findings in different tissues.

Indexed as

Auxiliary informationDistributed computingeQTL analysisMultiple testing

Identifiers

PMID38264292
PMCPMC10805471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.