Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38264276›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of general medicine2024

Comparison of Two Norepinephrine Rescue Bolus Doses for Management of Severe Post-Spinal Hypotension During Elective Caesarean Delivery: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Sarah M Amin, Ahmed Hasanin, Nashwa Talaat Ghanem, Maha Mostafa, Nashwa Elzayat, Mona Elsherbiny, Yaser Abdelwahab

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05290740 (Comparison of Two Norepinephrine Rescue Bolus Doses for Management of Severe Post-spinal Hypotension During Elective Cesarean Delivery), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05290740 phase4completednot on this map

Comparison of Two Norepinephrine Rescue Bolus Doses for Management of Severe Post-spinal Hypotension During Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKasr El Aini HospitalRan2022 to 2022Enrolled158ConditionsPostspinal Hypotension, Cesarean Delivery, NorepinephrineArmsNorepinephrine 5 mcg, Norepinephrine 10 mcg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah M AminDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-7931-0674
Ahmed HasaninDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-9947-5863
Nashwa Talaat GhanemDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Maha MostafaDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Nashwa ElzayatDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mona ElsherbinyDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Yaser AbdelwahabDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Post-spinal hypotension is associated with maternal and neonatal complications; therefore, prompt control maternal blood pressure is necessary. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of two norepinephrine bolus doses in the rescue management of severe maternal hypotension during elective Cesarean delivery. Methods: We included full-term pregnant women scheduled for Cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Patients were randomized to receive either 5-mcg norepinephrine (n=79) or 10-mcg norepinephrine (n=79) for treatment of severe postspinal hypotension (systolic blood pressure ≤60% of baseline reading). The management of the hypotensive episode was considered successful if systolic blood pressure was >80% of the baseline within 2 mins of the bolus. The primary outcome was the incidence of successful management of severe post-spinal hypotension. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of reactive bradycardia, reactive hypertension, umbilical blood gases, and neonatal Apgar score at 5-min post-delivery. Results: We included 73 patients in the 5-mcg group and 76 patients in the 10-mcg group into the final analysis. The incidence of successful management of severe hypotensive episodes was comparable between the two groups (43/73 [59%] and 46/76 [60%] in the 5-and 10-mcg group, respectively, Conclusion: In mothers undergoing Cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia, 10-mcg norepinephrine bolus was not superior to the 5-mcg bolus in the management of severe hypotension. Furthermore, the incidence of reactive bradycardia and hypertension was comparable in the two doses. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05290740, URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05290740.

Indexed as

cesarean deliverynorepinephrinesevere hypotensionspinal anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID38264276
PMCPMC10804872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.