ArticleBiomedicine hub
GLI-12 Reference Values versus Fixed 0.7 Ratio for the Detection of Airflow Obstruction in the Presence of Lung Hyperinflation.
Article in Biomedicine hub. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Airflow obstruction (AO) is evidenced by reduced forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) with the threshold for diagnosis often being set at <0.7. However, currently the ATS/ERS standards for interpretation of lung function tests recommend the lower limit of normal (LLN), calculated by reference equations of the Global Lung Initiative from 2012 (GLI-12), as a threshold for AO diagnosis. The present study aims to investigate phenotypes, with focus on hyperinflation, which influence AO prevalence defined by FEV1/FVC < LLN when compared to the fixed 0.7 threshold. Methods: Data from 3,875 lung function tests (56.4% men, aged 18-95) including 3,824 body plethysmography recordings performed from July 2021 to June 2022 were analysed. The difference between both classifiers was quantified, before and after stratification by sex, age, and hyperinflation. Results: AO diagnosis was significantly less frequent with the LLN threshold (18.2%) compared to the fixed threshold (28.0%) ( Conclusion: The importance of using the LLN threshold instead of the fixed 0.7 threshold for the diagnosis of AO is highlighted. When using the fixed threshold AO, misdiagnosis was more common in the presence of mild to moderate hyperinflation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.