ArticleCureus2024
The Need for Protocol-Based Training in Delivering Bad News in Dentistry: A Cross-Sectional Survey Among Dental Professionals in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to explore the awareness and utilization of protocols (e.g., the SPIKES protocol) for delivering bad news among dental professionals and the perceived need for such training.
methodsThis study employed a cross-sectional design. A web-based self-administered questionnaire was distributed among dental students, general dentists, and dental specialists/consultants in Jeddah City through social media groups. The questionnaire included questions regarding the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of delivering bad news in dentistry and the use of the SPIKES protocol. Descriptive statistics and bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the research objectives.
resultsTwo hundred and twelve participants responded to the questionnaire, with an almost equal distribution between genders. Specialists/consultants and dental students comprised 87.8% of the respondents. Most respondents (70%) were unaware of any protocols for delivering bad news, and approximately 89% were unaware of the SPIKES protocol. Only 7% reported using the SPIKES protocol to deliver bad news. The bivariate analysis revealed two significant associations. The first association indicated a variation in awareness based on professional status, and the second suggested that experience in delivering bad news affected perceptions of the importance of protocol-based training. Logistic regression models revealed that specialist/consultant status was significantly associated with decreased awareness of protocols (OR = 0.287, 95% CI 0.091-0.903) as compared to general dentists and that other variables, including sex and experience in delivering bad news, did not indicate a statistically significant effect.
conclusionMost dentists in Jeddah reported the need to be familiar with and practice delivering bad news in dentistry. They agreed that it would improve patients' acceptance of bad news if it were performed in a systematic and organized manner (e.g., the SPIKES protocol).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.