ArticleMalawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi2023
A survey of ORF8 sequence and immunoinformatics features during alpha, delta, and wild type peaks of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Iran.
Article in Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic influences all around the world. The SARS-CoV-2 ORF8 accessory gene represents multiple functions in virus-host interaction. The current study aimed to compare the ORF8 substitutions and epitope features of these substitutions in the various SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks including delta, alpha, and wild type variants in Iran from 2020 to 2022. In addition, we evaluate B cell, HLA I and II epitopes, by in-silico approach to ORF8 binding site prediction. Methods: The samples were collected from patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection via a real-time PCR assay. Then, a conventional PCR was carried out for ORF8 mutations analysis and further Sanger sequencing. Possible important alterations in epitope features of the ORF8 were evaluated by epitope mapping. B cell, HLA class I and II epitopes, evaluated by online databases ABCpred, NetMHCpan-4.1, and NetMHCIIpan-3.2, respectively. Results: The current study results could not represent novel variations in seven full-length ORF8 sequences or major ORF8 deletions in 80 evaluated samples. In addition, we could not find any ORF8 A382 during each outbreak of variants. Epitope mapping represents differences between the Alpha and other variants, especially in B cell potential epitopes and HLA I. Conclusion: The immunoinformatic evaluation of ORF8 suggested epitopes represent major differences for the Alpha variant in comparison with other variants. In addition, having mild pathogenesis of the Omicron variant does not seem to be associated with ORF8 alteration by phylogenetic evaluation. Future in-vitro studies for a clear conclusion about the epitope features of ORF8 are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.