ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2024
Impact of the Integrated Activation System on Door-to-Balloon Times and Clinical Outcomes in STEMI Patients Receiving Primary PCI.
Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The door-to-balloon (D2B) time is a critical quality measure in managing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We developed an integrated STEMI activation system, named Acute Myocardial Infarction Software Aids (AMISTAD), to optimize care for STEMI patients. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the AMISTAD system on D2B times and clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively collected data of consecutive STEMI patients receiving primary PCI between July 2017 and December 2018 at a single center. The patients were categorized into AMISTAD and non-AMISTAD groups. Outcomes included D2B time, length of hospital stay, and 12-month cardiovascular outcomes. Data were analyzed using multiple regression models; subgroup and sensitivity analyses were applied to examine the robustness of the results. Results: A total of 114 STEMI patients were enrolled (38 AMISTAD, 76 non-AMISTAD). The AMISTAD group had a significantly shorter mean D2B time (66.7 ± 13.2 vs. 76.6 ± 24.9 minutes, p = 0.02) and non-significantly shorter length of hospital stay (4.7 vs. 7.2 days, p = 0.09). The 12-month cardiovascular outcomes between the two groups were not significantly different (adjusted hazard ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.30-2.09, p = 0.64). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses had consistent outcomes. Conclusions: Integrating the AMISTAD system into the STEMI workflow was associated with a reduced D2B time and shorter hospital stay. Further research involving larger cohorts and extended follow-up periods is needed to assess the generalizability and impact on cardiovascular outcomes. The AMISTAD system has the potential to improve the quality of care for STEMI patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.