Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38264014›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2024

miR‑146a‑5p and miR‑191‑5p as novel diagnostic marker candidates for ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

Shigeatsu Takamizawa, Junya Kojima, Tomohiro Umezu, Masahiko Kuroda, Shigehiro Hayashi, Takenori Maruta, Aikou Okamoto, Hirotaka Nishi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shigeatsu TakamizawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Junya KojimaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Tomohiro UmezuDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-8402, Japan.
Masahiko KurodaDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-8402, Japan.
Shigehiro HayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Takenori MarutaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Aikou OkamotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Hirotaka NishiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is a malignant gynecologic disease rarely diagnosed in the early stages. Among the various types of ovarian cancer, clear cell carcinoma has a poor prognosis due to its malignant potential. MicroRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) regulate gene expression in cells by suppressing the translation of target genes or by degrading the target mRNA. miRNAs are also secreted from the cells in the blood, binding to proteins or lipids and assisting in cell-cell communication. Therefore, serum miRNAs may be considered potential diagnostic biomarkers for ovarian cancer. The present study investigated and identified specific miRNAs associated with ovarian clear cell carcinoma and compared them to those in ovarian endometrioma samples and healthy controls. CA125, an ovarian tumor marker, did not differ between patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma, endometriosis or healthy controls. Subsequently, four miRNAs (miR-146a-5p, miR-191-5p, miR-484 and miR-574-3p) were analyzed. The expression levels of miR-146a-5p and miR-191-5p were significantly increased in the serum samples from patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma compared with those in the healthy controls, but there was no significant difference compared with in patients with endometriosis. Furthermore, the bioinformatics analysis showed that

Indexed as

CA125endometriomaendometriosismalignantnon-invasiveovarian cancerROC curvesensitivityspecificity

Identifiers

PMID38264014
PMCPMC10804375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.