ArticleObesity science & practice2024
Patient perspectives about treatment preferences for obesity with complications.
Article in Obesity science & practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient expectations and healthcare professional education in obesity care: A comparative qualitative study.Obesity pillars · 2026Article
- Dietitians' Perceptions of the Obesity Care Pathway: Qualitative Insights on Access, Follow-Up, and Referral of Patients Living With Obesity.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026Article
- One size does not fit all: Qualitative interviews with individuals with overweight or obesity and healthcare providers on navigating and supporting weight management.Obesity pillars · 2026Article
- Digital Patient Decision Aid for Antiobesity Medications: Mixed Methods Study of Human-Centered Design and Usability Evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Why Some Patients Choose Nutritional Therapy over Medications and Surgery in Obesity Care.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Logistics, effectiveness, safety, and accessibility: Factors determining obesity medication patient preferences from a photovoice analysis.Obesity pillars · 2026Article
- Effects of salivary amylase gene copy number on metabolic health.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- A cost-effectiveness analysis of behavioural, pharmacological, and surgical obesity treatments in Canada.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
- Socio-demographic and clinical factors associated with the receipt of anti-obesity medication prescriptions and metabolic and bariatric surgery among eligible all of Us participants.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
- How do patients choose between obesity medications: A thematic analysis.Obesity pillars · 2025Article
- Factors influencing patients to choose one obesity treatment over another: a qualitative study.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2025Article
- Mixed Methods to Assess Sex Differences in Weight Bias Internalization Among Patients With Obesity.Obesity science & practice · 2025Article
- Common Peroneal Nerve Paralysis Following Rapid Weight Loss-A Case Report and Literature Review.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Article
- Factors that determine patients considering medication for the disease of obesity: an IMI2 SOPHIA study.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2025Article
- Sex differences in perceived discrimination among patients with obesity.Clinical obesity · 2025Article
- 'Beyond the Scale': A Qualitative Exploration of the Impact of Weight Stigma Experienced by Patients With Obesity in General Practice.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- A Primary Care-Based Weight Navigation Program.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Patient perspectives about treatment preferences for obesity with complications.Obesity science & practice · 2024Article
- The user-centered design and development of a childhood and adolescent obesity Electronic Health Record tool, a mixed-methods study.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Obesity and many of its comorbidities can be improved by nutritional therapy, lifestyle modification, pharmacotherapy, and surgical intervention. Relatively little is known about patients' preferences for the range of obesity treatments. The present study was undertaken to identify factors that may influence these preferences. By evaluating patient-preferred treatment options and factors influencing patients, treatment adherence and efficacy may be improved. Our objective was to identify factors that influence patient preferences and subsequent choice of obesity treatment among those seeking treatment for obesity-related complications. Methods: Participatory action research, using purposeful sampling, was used to recruit 33 patients with obesity complications. Recruitment took place in specialist clinics for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. Sixteen males and 17 females aged 18-70 years with a BMI>35 kg/m Results: Four themes emerged: 1) structural factors, 2) autonomy, 3) interaction with formal care, and 4) the emotional and physical consequences of obesity. 39% of participants preferred nutritional therapy with support from medical professionals. 27% chose bariatric surgery. 24% chose pharmacotherapy alone, while 6% chose pharmacotherapy combined with nutritional therapy, 3% of participants wanted no intervention. Conclusion: The challenges can be addressed by increasing support for healthcare professionals toward enhancing both their knowledge and the health literacy of patients. Future research should focus on improving access to treatment pathways for patients as well as developing health literacy programs and educational programs for healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.