ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2024
Prediction of mechanical ventilation outcome by early abdominal-visceral-blood-flow-and-function score in critically ill patients after cardiopulmonary bypass in the ICU: A prospective observational study.
Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07339449 (Intraoperative Multimodal Monitoring as a Means in Reducing the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Procedures - A Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intraoperative Multimodal Monitoring as a Means in Reducing the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Procedures - A Pilot Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Abdominal organs are important organs that sense and respond to ischemia and hypoxia, but there are few evaluation methods.We use ultrasonography to evaluate abdominal organ function and blood flow in patients with mechanical ventilation (MV) after cardiopulmonary bypass and to obtain a semiquantitative score for abdominal organ function and blood flow. Methods: Patients with cardiopulmonary bypass in the Critical Care Department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital in China from March to July 2021 were enrolled in this prospective observational study. The correlation of the abdominal-visceral-blood-flow-and-function score (AVBFS) with the duration of MV, number of days spent in the intensive care unit (ICU), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE-II), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), lactate, epinephrine, and norepinephrine use was analyzed, and the results were used to assess the predictive value of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) regression analysis score for the duration of MV. Results: Of the 92 patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass, 41 were finally included. The AVBFS were significantly correlated with the duration of MV, number of days spent in the ICU, APACHE-II score, SOFA score, and norepinephrine use time. The AVBFS in a group of patients using ventilators ≥36 h were significantly higher than those obtained for a group of patients using ventilators <36 h ( Conclusions: Abdominal visceral organ function and blood perfusion can be used to evaluate gastrointestinal function. It is related to early and late extubation after cardiac surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.