ArticleLa Tunisie medicale2023
Article in La Tunisie medicale, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMedical education has progressed considerably. Information and communication technologies have been adopted as a learning tool.
aimWe aimed to evaluate the contribution of an educational video in the acquisition of knowledge on the measurement of the Schöber index in young medical students.
methodsThis is a prospective study, spread over 4 months (February 2022-May 2022) and conducted in the rheumatology and orthopedics departments of the Charles Nicolle Hospital in Tunis. We included medical students during their externship at the mentioned services. We compared the realization of the steps of the Schöber test (testing the flexibility of the lumbar spine) before and after the visualization of an educational video.
resultsA total of 32 students (6 men and 26 women) were enrolled. There were 18 students (56%) in DCEM1 and 14 students (44%) in PCEM2. Our study showed that the number of students who correctly performed the different steps of the Schöber test increased after viewing the instructional video compared to the beginning, but this increase was not significant. There were some differences between the PCEM2 and DCEM1 groups before viewing the video, but this difference decreased after viewing the video.
conclusionOur study has demonstrated the value of an educational video in improving the knowledge of medical students. This work needs to be applied on a larger scale in different medical specialties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38263924PMC11157235What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.