Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38263850›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2024

Separation of platelets by size in a microfluidic device based on controlled incremental filtration.

Mai T P Dinh, Anton Mukhamedshin, Kumar Abhishek, Fong W Lam, Sean C Gifford, Sergey S Shevkoplyas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mai T P DinhDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, 3605 Cullen Blvd, Houston, TX 77204-5060, USA. sshevkoplyas@uh.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2876-9984
Anton MukhamedshinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, 3605 Cullen Blvd, Houston, TX 77204-5060, USA. sshevkoplyas@uh.edu.
Kumar AbhishekDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, 3605 Cullen Blvd, Houston, TX 77204-5060, USA. sshevkoplyas@uh.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3921-5749
Fong W LamDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Sean C GiffordHalcyon Biomedical Incorporated, Friendswood, TX 77546, USA.
Sergey S ShevkoplyasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, 3605 Cullen Blvd, Houston, TX 77204-5060, USA. sshevkoplyas@uh.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8203-8365
University of Houston · USBaylor College of Medicine · USHalcyon Biomedical (United States) · US

Funding

Enabling pediatric leukapheresis with high-throughput microfluidic technologyR01HL151858 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI SHEVKOPLYAS, SERGEY S · 2020 to 2023
$1.6M
Centrifugation-free washing and volume-reduction of platelet concentrate units using high-throughput microfluidic technologyR21HL150154 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI SHEVKOPLYAS, SERGEY S · 2020 to 2021
$421k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL151858NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL150154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The significant biological and functional differences between small and large platelets suggested by recent studies could have profound implications for transfusion medicine. However, investigating the relationship between platelet size and function is challenging because separating platelets by size without affecting their properties is difficult. A standard approach is centrifugation, but it inevitably leads to premature activation and aggregation of separated platelets. This paper describes the development and validation of a microfluidic device based on controlled incremental filtration (CIF) for separating platelets by size without the cell damage and usability limitations associated with centrifugation. Platelet samples derived from whole blood were used to evaluate the dependence of the CIF device separation performance on design parameters and flow rate, and to compare the properties of PLT fractions generated by the CIF device with those produced using a centrifugation protocol in a split-sample study. This was accomplished by quantifying the platelet size distribution, mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet-large cell ratio (P-LCR) and platelet activation before and after processing for all input and output samples. The 'large platelet' fractions produced by the CIF device and the centrifugation protocol were essentially equivalent (no significant difference in MPV and P-LCR). Platelets in the 'small platelet' fraction produced by the CIF device were significantly smaller than those produced by centrifugation (lower MPV and P-LCR). This was because the CIF 'small platelet' fraction was contaminated by much fewer large platelets (∼2-times lower recovery of >12 fL platelets) and retained the smallest platelets that were discarded by the centrifugation protocol. There was no significant difference in platelet activation between the two methods. However, centrifugation required a substantial amount of additional anticoagulant to prevent platelet aggregation during pelleting. Unlike centrifugation, the CIF device offered continuous, flow-through, single-step processing that did not cause platelet aggregation. Such a capability has the potential to accelerate the basic studies of the relationship between platelet size and function, and ultimately improve transfusion practice, particularly in the pediatric setting, where the need for low-volume, high-quality platelet transfusions is most urgent.

Indexed as

Blood PlateletsPlatelet AggregationCell SeparationCentrifugationChildFiltrationHumansLab-On-A-Chip Devices

Identifiers

PMID38263850
PMCPMC12400926
OpenAlexW4390924075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.