Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38263826›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2024

Computer-extracted global radiomic features can predict the radiologists' first impression about the abnormality of a screening mammogram.

Somphone Siviengphanom, Sarah J Lewis, Patrick C Brennan, Ziba Gandomkar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Somphone SiviengphanomMedical Image Optimisation and Perception Group, Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2891-9217
Sarah J LewisMedical Image Optimisation and Perception Group, Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Patrick C BrennanMedical Image Optimisation and Perception Group, Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Ziba GandomkarMedical Image Optimisation and Perception Group, Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

Cancer Institute New South Wales Early Career Fellowship 2022/ECF1426National Breast Cancer Foundation IIRS-18-089National Health and Medical Research Council APP1162872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRadiologists can detect the gist of abnormal based on their rapid initial impression on a mammogram (ie, global gist signal [GGS]). This study explores (1) whether global radiomic (ie, computer-extracted) features can predict the GGS; and if so, (ii) what features are the most important drivers of the signals.

methodsThe GGS of cases in two extreme conditions was considered: when observers detect a very strong gist (high-gist) and when the gist of abnormal was not/poorly perceived (low-gist). Gist signals/scores from 13 observers reading 4191 craniocaudal mammograms were collected. As gist is a noisy signal, the gist scores from all observers were averaged and assigned to each image. The high-gist and low-gist categories contained all images in the fourth and first quartiles, respectively. One hundred thirty handcrafted global radiomic features (GRFs) per mammogram were extracted and utilized to construct eight separate machine learning random forest classifiers (All, Normal, Cancer, Prior-1, Prior-2, Missed, Prior-Visible, and Prior-Invisible) for characterizing high-gist from low-gist images. The models were trained and validated using the 10-fold cross-validation approach. The models' performances were evaluated by the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Important features for each model were identified through a scree test.

resultsThe Prior-Visible model achieved the highest AUC of 0.84 followed by the Prior-Invisible (0.83), Normal (0.82), Prior-1 (0.81), All (0.79), Prior-2 (0.77), Missed (0.75), and Cancer model (0.69). Cluster shade, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, and range were identified to be the most important features.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that GRFs can accurately classify high- from low-gist images. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Global mammographic radiomic features can accurately predict high- from low-gist images with five features identified to be valuable in describing high-gist images. These are critical in providing better understanding of the mammographic image characteristics that drive the strength of the GGSs which could be exploited to advance breast cancer (BC) screening and risk prediction, enabling early detection and treatment of BC thereby further reducing BC-related deaths.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsRadiomicsComputersFemaleHumansMammographyRadiologistsbreast cancercurrent mammogramsgistglobal radiomic featuresmachine learningprior mammogramsradiomicsscreening mammograms

Identifiers

PMID38263826
PMCPMC11027311
OpenAlexW4390742427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.