ReviewNPJ digital medicine2024
An intriguing vision for transatlantic collaborative health data use and artificial intelligence development.
Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- BRIDGE pilot study: a bilateral regulatory investigation of data governance and exchange.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- A call for action to strengthen stakeholder readiness for ICF data exchange in European health data space: a structured narrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Utilizing a publicly accessible automated machine learning platform to enable diagnosis before tumor surgery.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- The impact of intelligent devices utilization on household medical expenditure of older adults in China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of natural language processing methodologies for classifying computed tomography enterography reports in Crohn's disease patients.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- An analytic research and review of the literature on practice of artificial intelligence in healthcare.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Use and Acceptance of Innovative Digital Health Solutions Among Patients and Professionals: Survey Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Interoperability Framework of the European Health Data Space for the Secondary Use of Data: Interactive European Interoperability Framework-Based Standards Compliance Toolkit for AI-Driven Projects.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Germany and Europe lead digital innovation and AI with collaborative health data use at continental level.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Attitudes of healthcare professionals and researchers toward wearable and app derived patient generated health data.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- The Way Forward to Embrace Artificial Intelligence in Public Health.American journal of public health · 2025Article
- The Digitized Memory Clinic.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Transforming the Future.Missouri medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our traditional approach to diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment, can no longer process and transform the enormous volume of information into therapeutic success, innovative discovery, and health economic performance. Precision health, i.e., the right treatment, for the right person, at the right time in the right place, is enabled through a learning health system, in which medicine and multidisciplinary science, economic viability, diverse culture, and empowered patient's preferences are digitally integrated and conceptually aligned for continuous improvement and maintenance of health, wellbeing, and equity. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been successfully evaluated in risk stratification, accurate diagnosis, and treatment allocation, and to prevent health disparities. There is one caveat though: dependable AI models need to be trained on population-representative, large and deep data sets by multidisciplinary and multinational teams to avoid developer, statistical and social bias. Such applications and models can neither be created nor validated with data at the country, let alone institutional level and require a new dimension of collaboration, a cultural change with the establishment of trust in a precompetitive space. The Data for Health (#DFH23) conference in Berlin and the Follow-Up Workshop at Harvard University in Boston hosted a representative group of stakeholders in society, academia, industry, and government. With the momentum #DFH23 created, the European Health Data Space (EHDS) as a solid and safe foundation for consented collaborative health data use and the G7 Hiroshima AI process in place, we call on citizens and their governments to fully support digital transformation of medicine, research and innovation including AI.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.