Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38263411›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Task design for crowdsourced glioma cell annotation in microscopy images.

Svea Schwarze, Nadine S Schaadt, Viktor M G Sobotta, Nicolai Spicher, Thomas Skripuletz, Majid Esmaeilzadeh, Joachim K Krauss, Christian Hartmann, Thomas M Deserno, Friedrich Feuerhake

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Svea Schwarze *Department of Neuropathology, Institute for Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Nadine S Schaadt *Department of Neuropathology, Institute for Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Viktor M G SobottaPeter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics of TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, Braunschweig, Germany.
Nicolai SpicherPeter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics of TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, Braunschweig, Germany.
Thomas SkripuletzDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Majid EsmaeilzadehDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Joachim K KraussDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Christian HartmannDepartment of Neuropathology, Institute for Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Thomas M DesernoPeter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics of TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, Braunschweig, Germany.
Friedrich FeuerhakeDepartment of Neuropathology, Institute for Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. Feuerhake.Friedrich@mh-hannover.de.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DETechnische Universität Braunschweig · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung FKZ 31L0237AElse Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung 2020_EKPK.20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crowdsourcing has been used in computational pathology to generate cell and cell nuclei annotations for machine learning. Herein, we broaden its scope to the previously unsolved challenging task of glioma cell detection. This requires multiplexed immunofluorescence microscopy due to diffuse invasiveness and exceptional similarity between glioma cells and reactive astrocytes. In four pilot experiments, we iteratively developed a task design enabling high-quality annotations by crowdworkers on Amazon Mechanical Turk. We applied majority or weighted vote and validated them against ground truth in the final setting. On the base of a YOLO convolutional neural network architecture, we used these consensus labels for training with different image representations regarding colors, intensities, and immmunohistochemical marker combinations. A crowd of 712 workers defined aggregated point annotations in 235 images with an average [Formula: see text] score of 0.627 for majority vote. The networks resulted in acceptable [Formula: see text] scores up to 0.69 for YOLOv8 on average and indicated first evidence for transferability to images lacking tumor markers, especially in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. Our work confirms feasibility of crowdsourcing to generate labels suitable for training of machine learning tools in the challenging and clinically relevant use case of glioma microenvironment.

Indexed as

CrowdsourcingGlioblastomaGliomaBiomarkers, TumorHumansMicroscopy, FluorescenceTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID38263411
PMCPMC10805723
OpenAlexW4391143096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.