ArticleScientific reports2024
Therapy-induced modulation of tumor vasculature and oxygenation in a murine glioblastoma model quantified by deep learning-based feature extraction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypoxia shapes both therapeutic response and resistance in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Cancer cell · 2026Article
- Review
- CAR-T cell therapies are coming after glioblastoma: An overview of early phase clinical trials and future perspectives.iScience · 2026Review
- Transcriptomics- and 3D imaging-based characterization of the lymphatic vasculature in human skin.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Advantages, applications, and future directions ofMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Review
- Article
- Targeting the tumour vasculature: from vessel destruction to promotion.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma presents characteristically with an exuberant, poorly functional vasculature that causes malperfusion, hypoxia and necrosis. Despite limited clinical efficacy, anti-angiogenesis resulting in vascular normalization remains a promising therapeutic approach. Yet, fundamental questions concerning anti-angiogenic therapy remain unanswered, partly due to the scale and resolution gap between microscopy and clinical imaging and a lack of quantitative data readouts. To what extend does treatment lead to vessel regression or vessel normalization and does it ameliorate or aggravate hypoxia? Clearly, a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms would greatly benefit the development of desperately needed improved treatment regimens. Here, using orthotopic transplantation of Gli36 cells, a widely used murine glioma model, we present a mesoscopic approach based on light sheet fluorescence microscopic imaging of wholemount stained tumors. Deep learning-based segmentation followed by automated feature extraction allowed quantitative analyses of the entire tumor vasculature and oxygenation statuses. Unexpectedly in this model, the response to both cytotoxic and anti-angiogenic therapy was dominated by vessel normalization with little evidence for vessel regression. Equally surprising, only cytotoxic therapy resulted in a significant alleviation of hypoxia. Taken together, we provide and evaluate a quantitative workflow that addresses some of the most urgent mechanistic questions in anti-angiogenic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.