ReviewPerioperative medicine (London, England)2024
Desmopressin to reduce periprocedural bleeding and transfusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of desmopressin in reducing post-procedural bleeding among chronic kidney disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of desmopressin on bleeding outcomes after native renal biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of Vitamin C on bleeding and pain after kidney biopsy: a randomized controlled trial.BMC medicine · 2026Trial
- [Effects of desmopressin versus tranexamic acid on reducing bleeding in knee arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized study].The Pan African medical journal · 2024Trial
- Dual receptor therapy with pituitrin for spinal cord injury-induced diabetes insipidus: A propensity-matched retrospective cohort study.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2026Article
- Article
- Haemostasis and beyond: The expanding role of desmopressin in intensive care.World journal of critical care medicine · 2025Review
- Perioperative Management of the Patient Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis.Anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Bleeding control in severe spinal deformity correction surgery: the use of tranexamic acid combined with desmopressin.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- When our intuition lets us down-something believed to be beneficial may actually be harmful.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025Article
- Treatment of hyponatremia: comprehension and best clinical practice.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2025Review
- The Role of Desmopressin in Kidney Biopsies: A Narrative Review.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We systematically reviewed the literature to investigate the effects of peri-procedural desmopressin in patients without known inherited bleeding disorders undergoing surgery or other invasive procedures. We included 63 randomized trials (4163 participants) published up to February 1, 2023. Seven trials were published after a 2017 Cochrane systematic review on this topic. There were 38 trials in cardiac surgery, 22 in noncardiac surgery, and 3 in non-surgical procedures. Meta-analyses demonstrated that desmopressin likely does not reduce the risk of receiving a red blood cell transfusion (25 trials, risk ratio [RR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86 to 1.05) and may not reduce the risk of reoperation due to bleeding (22 trials, RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.19) when compared to placebo or usual care. However, we demonstrated significant reductions in number of units of red blood cells transfused (25 trials, mean difference -0.55 units, 95% CI - 0.94 to - 0.15), total volume of blood loss (33 trials, standardized mean difference - 0.40 standard deviations; 95% CI - 0.56 to - 0.23), and the risk of bleeding events (2 trials, RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.84). The certainty of evidence of these findings was generally low. Desmopressin increased the risk of clinically significant hypotension that required intervention (19 trials, RR 2.15, 95% CI 1.36 to 3.41). Limited evidence suggests that tranexamic acid is more effective than desmopressin in reducing transfusion risk (3 trials, RR 2.38 favoring tranexamic acid, 95% CI 1.06 to 5.39) and total volume of blood loss (3 trials, mean difference 391.7 mL favoring tranexamic acid, 95% CI - 93.3 to 876.7 mL). No trials directly informed the safety and hemostatic efficacy of desmopressin in advanced kidney disease. In conclusion, desmopressin likely reduces periprocedural blood loss and the number of units of blood transfused in small trials with methodologic limitations. However, the risk of hypotension needs to be mitigated. Large trials should evaluate desmopressin alongside tranexamic acid and enroll patients with advanced kidney disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.