ArticleScientific reports2024
A multinational study on the factors influencing university students' attitudes and usage of ChatGPT.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nurses' and Nursing Students' Experiences With Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational and Clinical Settings: A Scoping Review.Nursing & health sciences · 2026Article
- Medical students' attitudes, usage patterns, and associated factors with DeepSeek adoption in education: a cross-sectional study in China.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Assessment of the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of pharmacy students toward self-medication using artificial intelligence: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence chatbots in endodontic education-Concepts and potential applications.International endodontic journal · 2026Review
- Article
- Comparing Perceptions of ChatGPT Use in Health Attitude Contexts Among Users and Nonusers: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Exploring Physicians' Willingness to Integrate Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice: Ethical and Practical Insights From a Jordanian Cross-Sectional Survey.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Exploring the use of AI methods and chatbots in medical education among medical students in Jordan: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Exploring the role of ChatGPT in artificial intelligence literacy: a study on usage and acceptance among nursing students.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Psychological Inclinations and Practical Utility of ChatGPT Among Undergraduate Dental Students at a Dental School in Karachi: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Untold stories of digital transformation in medical education: AI overdependence and nomophobia among medical students.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Pre-service mathematics teachers' use of artificial intelligence: an extended technology acceptance model with self-efficacy (the case of ChatGPT).Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Use of ChatGPT among Student Nurses in Baguio City, Philippines: A Cross-sectional Study.Acta medica Philippina · 2026Article
- The health production function in South Asia: panel evidence on education, health expenditure, governance, and longevity.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The Perspective of Occupational Therapy Students Toward the Use of ChatGPT in Academics in Saudi Arabia: A Qualitative Study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- An experimental evaluation of an AI-powered interactive learning platform.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Evaluation of attitudes of university students towards artificial intelligence using data mining methods.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Attitudes and usage of ChatGPT among pharmacy students in a Sub-Saharan African country, Zambia: findings and implications on the education system.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Status and perceptions of ChatGPT utilization among medical students: a survey-based study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Evaluating the agreement between ChatGPT-4 and validated questionnaires in screening for anxiety and depression in college students: a cross-sectional study.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence models, like ChatGPT, have the potential to revolutionize higher education when implemented properly. This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing university students' attitudes and usage of ChatGPT in Arab countries. The survey instrument "TAME-ChatGPT" was administered to 2240 participants from Iraq, Kuwait, Egypt, Lebanon, and Jordan. Of those, 46.8% heard of ChatGPT, and 52.6% used it before the study. The results indicated that a positive attitude and usage of ChatGPT were determined by factors like ease of use, positive attitude towards technology, social influence, perceived usefulness, behavioral/cognitive influences, low perceived risks, and low anxiety. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the adequacy of the "TAME-ChatGPT" constructs. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the attitude towards ChatGPT usage was significantly influenced by country of residence, age, university type, and recent academic performance. This study validated "TAME-ChatGPT" as a useful tool for assessing ChatGPT adoption among university students. The successful integration of ChatGPT in higher education relies on the perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, positive attitude towards technology, social influence, behavioral/cognitive elements, low anxiety, and minimal perceived risks. Policies for ChatGPT adoption in higher education should be tailored to individual contexts, considering the variations in student attitudes observed in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.