Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38263202›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2024

Safe inhalation pipe provision (SIPP): protocol for a mixed-method evaluation of an intervention to improve health outcomes and service engagement among people who use crack cocaine in England.

Magdalena Harris, Jenny Scott, Vivian Hope, Joanna Busza, Sedona Sweeney, Andrew Preston, Mat Southwell, Niamh Eastwood, Cedomir Vuckovic, Caitlynne McGaff and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Magdalena HarrisDepartment of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK. magdalena.harris@lshtm.ac.uk.
Jenny ScottCentre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Vivian HopePublic Health Institute/School of Public and Allied Health, Liverpool John Moores University, 3rd Floor Exchange Station, Tithebarn Street, Liverpool, L2 2QP, UK.
Joanna BuszaDepartment of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
Sedona SweeneyDepartment of Global Health and Development, LSHTM, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
Andrew PrestonExchange Supplies, 1 Great Western Industrial Centre, Dorchester, Dorset, DT1 1, UK.
Mat SouthwellCoact, 2 Crescent Place Mews, Bath, BA2 2PY, UK.
Niamh EastwoodRelease, 61 Mansell Street, London, E1 8AN, UK.
Cedomir VuckovicDepartment of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
Caitlynne McGaffDepartment of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
Ian YoonDepartment of Global Health and Development, LSHTM, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
Louise WilkinsThe Health Shop, 12 Broad Street, Nottingham, NG1 3AL, UK.
Shoba RamThe Maples, Verona House, 53 Filwood Rd, Bristol, BS16 3RX, UK.
Catherine LordBristol Drugs Project, 11 Brunswick Square, St Paul's, Bristol, BS2 8PE, UK.
Philippe BonnetThe Hepatitis C Trust, 72 Weston Street, London, SE1 3QG, UK.
Peter FurlongChange Grow Live, 34 Albion Place, Leeds, LS1 6JH, UK.
Natasha SimpsonCranstoun Sandwell, 128B Oldbury Rd, Smethwick, B66 1JE, UK.
Holly SlaterPOW Nottingham, 16 Independent Street, Nottingham, NG7 3LN, UK.
Lucy PlattDepartment of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBRoyal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · GBAt Bristol · GBLiverpool John Moores University · GBRelease Mobile (United Kingdom) · GBSandwell College · GBThe Hepatitis C Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR 133118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 180,000 people use crack cocaine in England, yet provision of smoking equipment to support safer crack use is prohibited under UK law. Pipes used for crack cocaine smoking are often homemade and/or in short supply, leading to pipe sharing and injuries from use of unsafe materials. This increases risk of viral infection and respiratory harm among a marginalised underserved population. International evaluations suggest crack pipe supply leads to sustained reductions in pipe sharing and use of homemade equipment; increased health risk awareness; improved service access; reduction in injecting and crack-related health problems. In this paper, we introduce the protocol for the NIHR-funded SIPP (Safe inhalation pipe provision) project and discuss implications for impact.

methodsThe SIPP study will develop, implement and evaluate a crack smoking equipment and training intervention to be distributed through peer networks and specialist drug services in England. Study components comprise: (1) peer-network capacity building and co-production; (2) a pre- and post-intervention survey at intervention and non-equivalent control sites; (3) a mixed-method process evaluation; and (4) an economic evaluation. Participant eligibility criteria are use of crack within the past 28 days, with a survey sample of ~ 740 for each impact evaluation survey point and ~ 40 for qualitative process evaluation interviews. Our primary outcome measure is pipe sharing within the past 28 days, with secondary outcomes pertaining to use of homemade pipes, service engagement, injecting practice and acute health harms. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: SIPP aims to reduce crack use risk practices and associated health harms; including through increasing crack harm reduction awareness among service providers and peers. Implementation has only been possible with local police approvals. Our goal is to generate an evidence base to inform review of the legislation prohibiting crack pipe supply in the UK. This holds potential to transform harm reduction service provision and engagement nationally.

conclusionPeople who smoke crack cocaine in England currently have little reason to engage with harm reduction and drug services. Little is known about this growing population. This study will provide insight into population characteristics, unmet need and the case for legislative reform.

trial registrationISRCTN12541454  https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12541454.

Indexed as

Crack CocaineCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandHarm ReductionHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareCrack CocaineCrack cocaineCrack pipeEvaluationHarm reductionHealth outcomesInterventionParticipatory researchService engagement

Identifiers

PMID38263202
PMCPMC10804795
OpenAlexW4391143513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.