Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38263188›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2024

Machine learning for risk stratification in the emergency department (MARS-ED) study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial on the implementation of a prediction model based on machine learning technology predicting 31-day mortality in the emergency department.

Paul M E L van Dam, William P T M van Doorn, Floor van Gils, Lotte Sevenich, Lars Lambriks, Steven J R Meex, Jochen W L Cals, Patricia M Stassen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05497830 (Machine Learning for Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05497830 nacompletednot on this map

Machine Learning for Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department: A Pilot Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaastricht University Medical CenterRan2022 to 2024Enrolled1,300ConditionsAcute Pain, EmergenciesArmsRISK-INDEX
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul M E L van DamDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section Acute Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center +, PO Box 5800, Maastricht, 6202 AZ, The Netherlands. paul.van.dam@mumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5172-2500
William P T M van DoornCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center +, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2676-7448
Floor van GilsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section Acute Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center +, PO Box 5800, Maastricht, 6202 AZ, The Netherlands.
Lotte SevenichDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section Acute Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center +, PO Box 5800, Maastricht, 6202 AZ, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8770-0402
Lars LambriksDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section Acute Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center +, PO Box 5800, Maastricht, 6202 AZ, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7633-6243
Steven J R MeexCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center +, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8147-9006
Jochen W L CalsDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9550-5674
Patricia M StassenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section Acute Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center +, PO Box 5800, Maastricht, 6202 AZ, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0864-1542
University Medical Center · USMaastricht University · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany prediction models have been developed to help identify emergency department (ED) patients at high risk of poor outcome. However, these models often underperform in clinical practice and their actual clinical impact has hardly ever been evaluated. We aim to perform a clinical trial to investigate the clinical impact of a prediction model based on machine learning (ML) technology.

methodsThe study is a prospective, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority pilot clinical trial. We will investigate the clinical impact of a prediction model based on ML technology, the RISK DISCUSSION: This pilot clinical trial investigates the clinical impact and implementation of an ML based prediction model in the ED. By assessing the clinical impact and prognostic accuracy of the RISK

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05497830. Machine Learning for Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department (MARS-ED). Registered on August 11, 2022. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05497830 .

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalMachine LearningAdultEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentTechnologyArtificial intelligenceEmergency departmentImplementationMachine learningMortalityPredictionPrognosisRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID38263188
PMCPMC10804603
OpenAlexW4391139081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.