Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38263183›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Rehabilitation in primary care for an ageing population: a secondary analysis from a scoping review of rehabilitation delivery models.

Vanessa Seijas, Roxanne Maritz, Satish Mishra, Renaldo M Bernard, Patricia Fernandes, Viola Lorenz, Barbara Machado, Ana María Posada, Luz Helena Lugo-Agudelo, Jerome Bickenbach and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vanessa SeijasFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Alpenquai 4, Lucerne, 6005, Switzerland. vanessa.seijas@paraplegie.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-8512
Roxanne MaritzFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Alpenquai 4, Lucerne, 6005, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5711-0388
Satish MishraDisability, Rehabilitation, Palliative and Long-Term Care, Health Workforce and Service Delivery Unit, Division of Country Health Policies and Systems, WHO Regional Office for Europe, UN City, Marmorvej 51, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2520-5892
Renaldo M BernardAgeing, Functioning Epidemiology and Implementation, Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6958-3369
Patricia FernandesDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Federal University of Parana, R. XV de Novembro, 1299 - Centro, Curitiba, PR, 80060-000, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2106-1852
Viola LorenzFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Alpenquai 4, Lucerne, 6005, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3176-6642
Barbara MachadoFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Alpenquai 4, Lucerne, 6005, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5530-4314
Ana María PosadaRehabilitation in Health Research Group, Sede de Investigación Universitaria, University of Antioquia, Cl. 62 # 52-59, Medellín, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0727-3269
Luz Helena Lugo-AgudeloRehabilitation in Health Research Group, Sede de Investigación Universitaria, University of Antioquia, Cl. 62 # 52-59, Medellín, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3467-8835
Jerome BickenbachFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Alpenquai 4, Lucerne, 6005, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3070-4407
Carla SabariegoFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Alpenquai 4, Lucerne, 6005, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6946-0177

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe world population is ageing rapidly. Rehabilitation is one of the most effective health strategies for improving the health and functioning of older persons. An understanding of the current provision of rehabilitation services in primary care (PC) is needed to optimise access to rehabilitation for an ageing population. The objectives of this scoping review are a) to describe how rehabilitation services are currently offered in PC to older persons, and b) to explore age-related differences in the type of rehabilitation services provided.

methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of a scoping review examining rehabilitation models for older persons, with a focus on PC. Medline and Embase (2015-2022) were searched to identify studies published in English on rehabilitation services for people aged 50 + . Two authors independently screened records and extracted data using the World Health Organization (WHO)'s operational framework, the Primary Health Care Systems (PRIMASYS) approach and the WHO paper on rehabilitation in PC. Data synthesis included quantitative and qualitative analysis.

resultsWe synthesised data from 96 studies, 88.6% conducted in high-income countries (HICs), with 31,956 participants and identified five models for delivering rehabilitation to older persons in PC: community, home, telerehabilitation, outpatient and eldercare. Nurses, physiotherapists, and occupational therapists were the most common providers, with task-shifting reported in 15.6% of studies. The most common interventions were assessment of functioning, rehabilitation coordination, therapeutic exercise, psychological interventions, and self-management education. Environmental adaptations and assistive technology were rarely reported.

conclusionsWe described how rehabilitation services are currently provided in PC and explored age-related differences in the type of rehabilitation services received. PC can play a key role in assessing functioning and coordinating the rehabilitation process and is also well-placed to deliver rehabilitation interventions. By understanding models of rehabilitation service delivery in PC, stakeholders can work towards developing more comprehensive and accessible services that meet the diverse needs of an ageing population. Our findings, which highlight the role of rehabilitation in healthy ageing, are a valuable resource for informing policy, practice and future research in the context of the United Nations Decade of Healthy Ageing, the Rehab2030 initiative and the recently adopted WHA resolution on strengthening rehabilitation in health systems, but the conclusions can only be applied to HICs and more studies are needed that reflect the reality in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

MedicineOccupational TherapySelf-Help DevicesAgedAged, 80 and overExercise TherapyHumansPrimary Health CareAnd health policyHealth services deliveryHealthy ageingOlder personsPrimary health careRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID38263183
PMCPMC10804573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.