Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38263156›Full record

ReviewNature communications2024

The principles of natural climate solutions.

Peter Woods Ellis, Aaron Marr Page, Stephen Wood, Joseph Fargione, Yuta J Masuda, Vanessa Carrasco Denney, Campbell Moore, Timm Kroeger, Bronson Griscom, Jonathan Sanderman and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
28.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. New opportunities and challenges for conservation evidence synthesis from advances in natural language processing.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. We need a solid scientific basis for nature-based climate solutions in the United States.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Peter Woods EllisThe Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, USA. pellis@tnc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7933-8298
Aaron Marr PageForum Nobis, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Stephen WoodThe Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9551-8165
Joseph FargioneThe Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0636-5380
Yuta J MasudaPaul G. Allen Family Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1698-4855
Vanessa Carrasco DenneyThe Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, USA.
Campbell MooreThe Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, USA.
Timm KroegerThe Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1077-3774
Bronson GriscomConservation International, Arlington, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8496-7213
Jonathan SandermanWoodwell Climate Research Center, Falmouth, MA, USA.
Tyson AtleoNature United, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Rane CortezThe Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, USA.
Sara LeavittThe Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, USA.
Susan C Cook-PattonThe Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7194-4397
The Nature Conservancy · USConservation International · USPaul G. Allen Family Foundation · USWoodwell Climate Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural climate solutions can mitigate climate change in the near-term, during a climate-critical window. Yet, persistent misunderstandings about what constitutes a natural climate solution generate unnecessary confusion and controversy, thereby delaying critical mitigation action. Based on a review of scientific literature and best practices, we distill five foundational principles of natural climate solutions (nature-based, sustainable, climate-additional, measurable, and equitable) and fifteen operational principles for practical implementation. By adhering to these principles, practitioners can activate effective and durable natural climate solutions, enabling the rapid and wide-scale adoption necessary to meaningfully contribute to climate change mitigation.

Identifiers

PMID38263156
PMCPMC10805724
OpenAlexW4391168808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.