Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38263154›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Development and validation of artificial intelligence-based analysis software to support screening system of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Yung-Taek Ouh, Tae Jin Kim, Woong Ju, Sang Wun Kim, Seob Jeon, Soo-Nyung Kim, Kwang Gi Kim, Jae-Kwan Lee

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Automated acquisition of explainable knowledge from unannotated colposcopic images for predicting the natural course of CIN2.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Yung-Taek OuhDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, 123, Jeokgeum-ro, Danwon-gu, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Tae Jin KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1, Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Woong JuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, 25, Magokdong-ro 2-gil, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang Wun KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seob JeonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, 31, Suncheonhyang 6-gil, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea.
Soo-Nyung KimR&D Center, NTL Medical Institute, Yongin, Republic of Korea.
Kwang Gi KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Gachon University College of Medicine, Gil Medical Center, 24, Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Kwan LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University Guro Hospital, 148, Gurodong-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea. jklee38@korea.ac.kr.
Yonsei University · KREwha Womans University · KRGachon University · KRKonkuk University · KRKorea University · KRKorea University Medical Center · KRSoonchunhyang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer, the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide, often proves fatal and stems from precursor lesions caused by high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection. Accurate and early diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment. Current screening methods, such as the Pap test, liquid-based cytology (LBC), visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), and HPV DNA testing, have limitations, requiring confirmation through colposcopy. This study introduces CerviCARE AI, an artificial intelligence (AI) analysis software, to address colposcopy challenges. It automatically analyzes Tele-cervicography images, distinguishing between low-grade and high-grade lesions. In a multicenter retrospective study, CerviCARE AI achieved a remarkable sensitivity of 98% for high-risk groups (P2, P3, HSIL or higher, CIN2 or higher) and a specificity of 95.5%. These findings underscore CerviCARE AI's potential as a valuable diagnostic tool for highly accurate identification of cervical precancerous lesions. While further prospective research is needed to validate its clinical utility, this AI system holds promise for improving cervical cancer screening and lessening the burden of this deadly disease.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansRetrospective StudiesSoftware

Identifiers

PMID38263154
PMCPMC10806233
OpenAlexW4391143225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.