Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38263138›Full record

ReviewTrials2024

Pragmatic randomized controlled trials: strengthening the concept through a robust international collaborative network: PRIME-9-Pragmatic Research and Innovation through Multinational Experimentation.

Elmir Omerovic, Mark Petrie, Björn Redfors, Stephen Fremes, Gavin Murphy, Guillaume Marquis-Gravel, Alexandra Lansky, Eric Velazquez, Divaka Perera, Christopher Reid and 9 more

Abstract readReviewLetter
In one paragraph

Review in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. How Pragmatic Are Sarcopenia Intervention Studies? A Systematic Review.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Surgical Risk and Revascularization-An Update.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Multinational Pediatric Critical Care Research in the Arab Gulf Region across 35 Pediatric Intensive Care Units: Ethical Approval Timelines and Lessons Learned.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Elmir Omerovic *Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Bruna Stråket 16, 41345, Gothenburg, Sweden. elmir@wlab.gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3875-8621
Mark Petrie *British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Björn RedforsDepartment of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Bruna Stråket 16, 41345, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Stephen FremesDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gavin MurphyCardiovascular Research Centre, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester, LE3 9QP, UK.
Guillaume Marquis-GravelMontreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Alexandra LanskyDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Eric VelazquezDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Divaka PereraBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence and National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre at the School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Christopher ReidCurtin School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia.
Julian SmithDepartment of Surgery (School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health), Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Peter van der MeerDepartment of Cardiology, Center for Blistering Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Eric LipsicDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Peter JuniOxford Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
John McMurrayBritish Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Johann BauersachsDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Lars KøberDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jean L RouleauInstitut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Torsten DoenstDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, University Hospital, Jena, Germany.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an era focused on value-based healthcare, the quality of healthcare and resource allocation should be underpinned by empirical evidence. Pragmatic clinical trials (pRCTs) are essential in this endeavor, providing randomized controlled trial (RCT) insights that encapsulate real-world effects of interventions. The rising popularity of pRCTs can be attributed to their ability to mirror real-world practices, accommodate larger sample sizes, and provide cost advantages over traditional RCTs. By harmonizing efficacy with effectiveness, pRCTs assist decision-makers in prioritizing interventions that have a substantial public health impact and align with the tenets of value-based health care. An international network for pRCT provides several advantages, including larger and diverse patient populations, access to a broader range of healthcare settings, sharing knowledge and expertise, and overcoming ethical and regulatory barriers. The hypothesis and study design of pRCT answers the decision-maker's questions. pRCT compares clinically relevant alternative interventions, recruits participants from diverse practice settings, and collects data on various health outcomes. They are scarce because the medical products industry typically does not fund pRCT. Prioritizing these studies by expanding the infrastructure to conduct clinical research within the healthcare delivery system and increasing public and private funding for these studies will be necessary to facilitate pRCTs. These changes require more clinical and health policy decision-makers in clinical research priority setting, infrastructure development, and funding. This paper presents a comprehensive overview of pRCTs, emphasizing their importance in evidence-based medicine and the advantages of an international collaborative network for their execution. It details the development of PRIME-9, an international initiative across nine countries to advance pRCTs, and explores various statistical approaches for these trials. The paper underscores the need to overcome current challenges, such as funding limitations and infrastructural constraints, to leverage the full potential of pRCTs in optimizing healthcare quality and resource utilization.

Indexed as

Administrative PersonnelResearch DesignEvidence-Based MedicineHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSample Size

Identifiers

PMID38263138
PMCPMC10807265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.