SynthesisReproductive health2024
Attitude towards assisted reproductive technology: acceptance of donors eggs, sperms, and embryos as treatment of human infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Reproductive health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of estradiol and progesterone levels on human chorionic gonadotropin day with pregnancy outcomes in IVF/ICSI fresh embryo transfer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Complementary Interventions Using Technology for Individuals With Infertility Using Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Scoping Review.Nursing & health sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- A Qualitative Study of the Emotional and Decision-Making Experiences of Mothers Whose Daughter Undergoes Assisted Reproductive Technology with Donor Sperm.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAssisted Reproductive Technology utilizes human sperm, eggs, or embryos in vitro to produce pregnancy. However, there is no evidence of the acceptance of these technologies by the community.
objectiveThis study aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of positive attitudes toward the acceptance of donor eggs, embryos, and sperm.
methodsThe protocol was registered in PROSPERO (number: CRD42022348036). The Condition, Context and Population (CoCoPop) protocol of the systematic review was used to address the relevant questions regarding the objective of the study. Data were extracted into Excel and pooled estimates were calculated using STATA Version 16.
resultsThe pooled prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor eggs, embryos, and sperms was 38.63%, 33.20%, and 31.34%, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that the pooled prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor eggs was high in non-Asian countries (47.78%) and among infertile men (38.60%). Similarly, the pooled prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor eggs was high in non-Asian countries (47.78%) and among infertile men (28.67%). However, the pooled prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor sperm was high in non-Asian countries (37.6%) and among infertile women (28.19%).
conclusionThe pooled estimate of the prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor eggs was higher than the prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor embryos and sperm. Infertile men and non-Asian countries have a higher prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting eggs and embryos, whereas non-Asian countries and infertile women present a higher prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor sperm. Therefore, regulatory bodies and policymakers should modify their rules and regulations to ensure the availability of minimum standards for the ethical and safe practice of donor conception as a treatment for infertility at national and international levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.