Observational studyBMC primary care2024
Preventive treatment patterns in the adult migraine population: an observational UK study over 7 years.
Observational study in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimisation or Restriction? Unpacking the Logic Behind NICE Decisions.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Article
- Case Report: A reversible autonomic-endothelial migraine pattern: a conceptual perspective illustrated by a clinical case.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Prevalence, Treatment, and Unmet Needs of Migraine in the Middle East: A Systematic Review.Pain and therapy · 2025Review
- Medication non-adherence as a driver of pharmaceutical waste: integrating top-down policies with bottom-up practice.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- An economic evaluation of eptinezumab for the preventive treatment of migraine in the UK, with consideration for natural history and work productivity.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCalcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) are recommended by the United Kingdom National Institute of Health and Care Excellence for the prevention of migraine as treatment beyond third line. We report migraine prevalence and preventive treatment patterns in the adult United Kingdom primary care population over a 7.5-year period, focusing on patients ceasing ≥ 3 oral preventive medication classes.
methodsStudy populations were retrieved from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database (study period: 19 September 2012 to 1 January 2020; inclusion criteria: ≥12 months follow-up, current-in-dataset, adult on 1 January 2020). Patients who used ≥ 1 oral preventive medication with ≥ 3-year follow-up after first prescription were considered preventive treatment users; class cessation was defined as cessation without evidence of restart within 6 months from end-of-supply date.
resultsOn 1 January 2020, 3.0% of the total study population were diagnosed with migraine (n = 81,190/2,664,306); of these, 42.4% were preventive treatment users (n = 34,448/81,190). The most frequently used oral migraine preventive medication classes were beta-blockers (n = 14,713), tricyclic antidepressants (n = 14,415) and antiepileptics (n = 6497). Among preventive treatment users, 7.7% (n = 2653/34,448) ceased ≥ 3 oral preventive medication classes; of these, 21.7% (n = 576/2653) had been referred to a neurologist.
conclusionsCompared to existing population-based estimates of migraine prevalence, our data further corroborates that a considerable proportion of patients with migraine do not seek treatment. Among those who sought primary care within a 7.5-year period, almost half received empirical oral preventive treatment. Importantly, nearly 1 of 10 preventive treatment users ceased ≥ 3 oral preventive medication classes, highlighting a need for additional therapeutic options. These patients may benefit from CGRP antagonists and/or injectable onabotulinumtoxinA; however, only a minority was referred to specialist care, where these options would be more available.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.