Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38262975›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2024

Point-of-care testing and antibiotics prescribing in out-of-hours general practice: a register-based study in Denmark.

Line Due Christensen, Claus Høstrup Vestergaard, Ellen Keizer, Bodil Hammer Bech, Flemming Bro, Morten Bondo Christensen, Linda Huibers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Point-of-care C-reactive protein testing in general practice out-of-hours services: tool or trap?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Line Due ChristensenResearch Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Alle 2, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark. linedue@gmail.com.
Claus Høstrup VestergaardResearch Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Alle 2, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ellen KeizerResearch Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Alle 2, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Bodil Hammer BechDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 2, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Flemming BroResearch Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Alle 2, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Morten Bondo ChristensenResearch Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Alle 2, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Linda HuibersResearch Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Alle 2, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DK

Funding

Foundation for Primary Health Care Research in the Central Denmark Region 1-30-72-112-16the Foundation for General Practice EMN-2017-00265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint-of-care testing may reduce diagnostic uncertainty in case of suspicion of bacterial infection, thereby contributing to prudent antibiotic prescribing. We aimed to study variations in the use of point-of-care tests (C-reactive protein test, rapid streptococcal antigen detection test, and urine dipstick) among general practitioners (GPs) and the potential association between point-of-care testing and antibiotic prescribing in out-of-hours general practice.

methodsWe conducted a population-based observational register-based study, based on patient contacts with out-of-hours general practice in the Central Denmark Region in 2014-2017. The tendency of GPs to use point-of-care testing was calculated, and the association between the use of point-of-care testing and antibiotic prescribing was evaluated with the use of binomial regression.

resultsOut-of-hours general practice conducted 794,220 clinic consultations from 2014 to 2017, of which 16.1% resulted in an antibiotic prescription. The GP variation in the use of point-of-care testing was largest for C-reactive protein tests, with an observed variation (p90/p10 ratio) of 3.0; this means that the GPs in the 90th percentile used C-reactive protein tests three times as often as the GPs in the 10th percentile. The observed variation was 2.1 for rapid streptococcal antigen detection tests and 1.9 for urine dipsticks. The GPs who tended to use more point-of-care tests prescribed significantly more antibiotics than the GPs who tended to use fewer point-of-care tests. The GPs in the upper quintile of the tendency to use C-reactive protein test prescribed 22% more antibiotics than the GPs in the lowest quintile (21% for rapid streptococcal antigen detection tests and 8% for urine dipsticks). Up through the quintiles, this effect exhibited a positive linear dose-response correlation.

conclusionThe GPs varied in use of point-of-care testing. The GPs who tended to perform more point-of-care testing prescribed more antibiotics compared with the GPs who tended to perform fewer of these tests.

Indexed as

After-Hours CareGeneral PracticeAnti-Bacterial AgentsC-Reactive ProteinDenmarkHumansPoint-of-Care TestingAnti-Bacterial AgentsC-Reactive ProteinAnti-bacterial agentsDenmarkGeneral practiceOut-of-hours medical carePoint-of-care testing

Identifiers

PMID38262975
PMCPMC10804570
OpenAlexW4391138876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.