ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2024
Deep Learning Enables Automatic Correction of Experimental HDX-MS Data with Applications in Protein Modeling.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Probing protein-lipid interactions by hydrogen/deuterium exchange-mass spectrometry: advances, challenges and future directions.Chemical science · 2026Review
- RosettaHDX: Predicting antibody-antigen interaction from hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry data.Journal of structural biology · 2025Article
- Protein Microarrays for High Throughput Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange Monitored by FTIR Imaging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Observed mass shifts associated with deuterium incorporation in hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) frequently deviate from the initial signals due to back and forward exchange. In typical HDX-MS experiments, the impact of these disparities on data interpretation is generally low because relative and not absolute mass changes are investigated. However, for more advanced data processing including optimization, experimental error correction is imperative for accurate results. Here the potential for automatic HDX-MS data correction using models generated by deep neural networks is demonstrated. A multilayer perceptron (MLP) is used to learn a mapping between uncorrected HDX-MS data and data with mass shifts corrected for back and forward exchange. The model is rigorously tested at various levels including peptide level mass changes, residue level protection factors following optimization, and ability to correctly identify native protein folds using HDX-MS guided protein modeling. AI is shown to demonstrate considerable potential for amending HDX-MS data and improving fidelity across all levels. With access to big data, online tools may eventually be able to predict corrected mass shifts in HDX-MS profiles. This should improve throughput in workflows that require the reporting of real mass changes as well as allow retrospective correction of historic profiles to facilitate new discoveries with these data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.