Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38262683›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2024

Inequalities in use of hospitals for childbirth among rural women in sub-Saharan Africa: a comparative analysis of 18 countries using Demographic and Health Survey data.

Manuela Straneo, Claudia Hanson, Thomas van den Akker, Bosede B Afolabi, Anteneh Asefa, Alexandre Delamou, Mardieh Dennis, Luis Gadama, Nyika Mahachi, Welcome Mlilo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Manuela StraneoDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden manuela.straneo@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-2464-1633
Claudia HansonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8066-7873
Thomas van den AkkerAthena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bosede B AfolabiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria.
Anteneh AsefaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Alexandre DelamouAfrica Center for Excellence (CEA-PMCT), Universite Gamal Abdel Nasser de Conakry, Conakry, Guinea.ORCID 0000-0002-9397-7106
Mardieh DennisLast Mile Health, Monrovia, Liberia.
Luis GadamaKamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Southern Region, Malawi.
Nyika MahachiZimbabwe College of Public Health Physicians, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Welcome MliloMatabeleland North Provincial Medical Directorate, Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Care, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.
Andrea B PembeDepartment of Obstetric and Gynaecology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Jovanny Tsuala FouogueDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Maternal Health, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Université de Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon.
Lenka BeňováDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8595-365X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRising facility births in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) mask inequalities in higher-level emergency care-typically in hospitals. Limited research has addressed hospital use in women at risk of or with complications, such as high parity, linked to poverty and rurality, for whom hospital care is essential. We aimed to address this gap, by comparatively assessing hospital use in rural SSA by wealth and parity.

methodsCountries in SSA with a Demographic and Health Survey since 2015 were included. We assessed rural hospital childbirth stratifying by wealth (wealthier/poorer) and parity (nulliparity/high parity≥5), and their combination. We computed percentages, 95% CIs and percentage-point differences, by stratifier level. To compare hospital use across countries, we produced a composite index, including six utilisation and equality indicators.

resultsThis cross-sectional study included 18 countries. In all, a minority of rural women used hospitals for childbirth (2%-29%). There were disparities by wealth and parity, and poorer, high-parity women used hospitals least. The poorer/wealthier difference in utilisation among high-parity women ranged between 1.3% (Mali) and 13.2% (Rwanda). We found use and equality of hospitals in rural settings were greater in Malawi and Liberia, followed by Zimbabwe, the Gambia and Rwanda. DISCUSSION: Inequalities identified across 18 countries in rural SSA indicate poor, higher-risk women of high parity had lower use of hospitals for childbirth. Specific policy attention is urgently needed for this group where disadvantage accumulates.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricParturitionCross-Sectional StudiesDemographyFemaleHospitalsHumansPregnancyEpidemiologyHealth systemsMaternal healthObstetrics

Identifiers

PMID38262683
PMCPMC10806834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.