ArticleBMJ open2024
Association of carotid intima-media thickness and dyslipidaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Development of an explainable machine learning model for 3-year cardiovascular risk prediction in new-onset type 2 diabetes using the TyG index and ultrasound features.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Effects of obstructive sleep apnea on vascular structure and function in adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes: a comparative study.Cardiovascular endocrinology & metabolism · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients with diabetes mellitus (DM) often present with comorbidities such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia, insulin resistance, obesity and hyperglycaemia, which increases their risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs)-related mortality. Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), a biomarker for subclinical atherosclerosis, has been associated with overall CVD, especially in type 2 DM (T2DM). Hence, this protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis aims to review existing literature on the association of CIMT and dyslipidaemia in patients with T2DM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The proposed systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted according to an updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols guideline. A comprehensive search of peer-reviewed studies on Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct and Web of Sciences databases will be conducted up to 30 June 2023. A meta-analysis of data extracted from selected studies will be performed to explore the association between dyslipidaemia and CIMT in patients with diabetes. The effect estimates will be reported as standardised mean differences/Cohen's d and 95% CIs. A random effect model will be used in case of high heterogeneity whereas fixed-effect model will be used in the absence of heterogeneity. All statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS V.29.0 software. In cases of high heterogeneity, subgroup analysis will be performed based on study design, countries of publication and body mass index to identify potential sources of heterogeneity. Publication bias will be assessed graphically via funnel plots and statistically using Egger's regression test. Sensitivity analysis will also be performed to evaluate the stability of the overall effect size and the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation will be used to grade the quality of analysed evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As the proposed study will use secondary published data, approval will not be sought from the ethics committee. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023451731.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.