ArticleBMJ open2024
Factors of hospital ethical climate among hospital nurses in Korea: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe hospital ethical climate refers to the ethical work environment within a hospital, which may positively or negatively impact individual nurses, nursing organisations and patient care. Most of studies investigating the hospital ethical climate among Korean nurses have been published in Korean. However, papers addressing the hospital ethical climate in Korean were excluded from the systematic review. To enhance our comprehension of the hospital ethical climate, a systematic review specifically focusing on Korean nurses is imperative. Additionally, it is crucial to ascertain the factors associated with the hospital ethical climate and their respective effect sizes through meta-analyses. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The systematic search will be conducted for papers published in both Korean and English, encompassing the hospital ethics climate of Korean nurses from 10 database inception to May 2023. Two reviewers will independently review each article based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and any differences in opinion will be resolved through discussion and consensus. The study selection process will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram. Quality assessment will be conducted using the Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies provided by Joanna Briggs Institute. Effect size will be analysed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software V.2.0. The results of this study will identify factors related to the hospital ethical climate and the effect size of these factors among nurses in Korea. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required, as the data will be collected from existing literature. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022379812.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.