ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024
My host's enemy is my enemy: plasmids carrying CRISPR-Cas as a defence against phages.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The pQBR mercury resistance plasmids: a model set of sympatric environmental mobile genetic elements.Microbial genomics · 2026Article
- Nested mobile genetic elements mediating antimicrobial resistance genes mobility within and betweeniScience · 2026Article
- Phage-plasmid-like elements are found throughout diverse environments and encode niche-specific functional traits.PloS one · 2026Article
- There and turn back again: the application of phage serine integrases in eukaryotic systems.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- A bioinformatic approach to identify confirmed and probable CRISPR-Cas systems in theFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Bacteria are infected by mobile genetic elements like plasmids and virulent phages, and those infections significantly impact bacterial ecology and evolution. Recent discoveries reveal that some plasmids carry anti-phage immune systems like CRISPR-Cas, suggesting that plasmids may participate in the coevolutionary arms race between virulent phages and bacteria. Intuitively, this seems reasonable as virulent phages kill the plasmid's obligate host. However, the efficiency of CRISPR-Cas systems carried by plasmids can be expected to be lower than those carried by the chromosome due to continuous segregation loss, creating susceptible cells for phage amplification. To evaluate the anti-phage protection efficiency of CRISPR-Cas on plasmids, we develop a stochastic model describing the dynamics of a virulent phage infection against which a conjugative plasmid defends using CRISPR-Cas. We show that CRISPR-Cas on plasmids provides robust protection, except in limited parameter sets. In these cases, high segregation loss favours phage outbreaks by generating a population of defenceless cells on which the phage can evolve and escape CRISPR-Cas immunity. We show that the phage's ability to exploit segregation loss depends strongly on the evolvability of both CRISPR-Cas and the phage itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.