Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38262109›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2024

Assessment of salivary miRNA, clinical, and demographic characterization in colorectal cancer diagnosis.

Maryam Koopaie, Soheila Manifar, Mona Mohammad Talebi, Sajad Kolahdooz, Amirnader Emami Razavi, Mansour Davoudi, Sara Pourshahidi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Maryam KoopaieDepartment of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address: m-koopaie@tums.ac.ir.
Soheila ManifarDepartment of Oral Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address: soheilaamanifar@gmail.com.
Mona Mohammad TalebiDepartment of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sajad KolahdoozUniversal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran.
Amirnader Emami RazaviIran National Tumor Bank, Cancer Research Center, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mansour DavoudiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering and IT, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Sara PourshahidiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRImam Khomeini Hospital · IRMotamed Cancer Institute · IRShiraz University · IRUniversal Scientific Education and Research Network · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimColorectal cancer (CRC), as the third most frequent malignancy in the world, is the fourth major cause of cancer-related mortality. Its early detection contributes significantly to a reduction in mortality. The objective of this case-control research was to analyze the salivary expression of microRNA-29a (miR-29a) and microRNA-92a (miR-92a), and also to consider demographic, clinical, and nutritional habits for differentiation between CRC patients and healthy controls, especially in the early stages.

methodA standard checklist was used to obtain the demographic information, clinical features, and dietary habits of the case and control groups. Samplings of whole unstimulated saliva samples were obtained from 33 healthy persons and 42 CRC patients. Through real-time PCR, statistical analyses, and machine learning analyses, miR-29a and miR-92a salivary expression levels were evaluated.

resultsThe mean salivary expression of miR-92a and miR-29a in CRC patients was significantly higher than in healthy controls (p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for miR-92a and miR-29a salivary biomarkers was 0.947 and 0.978, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity values for miR-92a were 95.24 % and 84.85 %, respectively, whereas sensitivity and specificity for miR-29a were equal to 95.20 % and 87.88 %, respectively. Multiple logistic regressions considering demographics, clinical features, and nutritional habits led to values of 95.35 % and 96.88 % as sensitivity and specificity, respectively, and machine learning analysis led to values of 88.89 % and 86.67 % as sensitivity and specificity, respectively.

conclusionCRC could be accurately diagnosed based on miR-92a and miR-29a levels in saliva. Statistical analysis and machine learning might develop cost-effective models for the distinction of CRC using a noninvasive technique.

Indexed as

Clinical characterizationsColorectal cancerMachine learningmicroRNASaliva

Identifiers

PMID38262109
PMCPMC10832612
OpenAlexW4391122997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.