Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38262102›Full record

Trial reportNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2024

Evidence of mirror therapy for recruitment of ipsilateral motor pathways in stroke recovery: A resting fMRI study.

Kexu Zhang, Li Ding, Xu Wang, Jinyang Zhuang, Shanbao Tong, Jie Jia, Xiaoli Guo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07150325 (Integration of Force Control Training and Mirror Visual Feedback on Stroke Patients on Brain Activation and Hand Function), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07150325 nacompletednot on this map

Integration of Force Control Training and Mirror Visual Feedback on Stroke Patients on Brain Activation and Hand Function

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cheng-Kung University HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled5ConditionsStroke, Stroke PatientsArmsTIPr, Mirror Visual Feedback Device, Mirror Visual Feedback Device(Blocked mirror)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kexu ZhangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Li DingDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xu WangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Jinyang ZhuangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shanbao TongSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Jie JiaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China; National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China; National Center for Neurological Disorders, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: shannonjj@126.com.
Xiaoli GuoSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: meagle@sjtu.edu.cn.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNHuashan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mirror therapy (MT) has been proposed to promote motor recovery post-stroke through activation of mirror neuron system, recruitment of ipsilateral motor pathways, or/and increasing attention toward the affected limb. However, neuroimaging evidence for these mechanisms is still lacking. To uncover the underlying mechanisms, we designed a randomized controlled study and used a voxel-based whole-brain analysis of resting-state fMRI to explore the brain reorganizations induced by MT. Thirty-five stroke patients were randomized to an MT group (n ​= ​16) and a conventional therapy (CT) group (n ​= ​19) for a 4-week intervention. Before and after the intervention, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Limb subscale (FMA-UL) and resting-state fMRI were collected. A healthy cohort (n ​= ​16) was established for fMRI comparison. The changes in fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (fALFF) and seed-based functional connectivity were analyzed to investigate the impact of intervention. Results showed that greater FMA-UL improvement in the MT group was associated with the compensatory increase of fALFF in the contralesional precentral gyrus (M1) region and the re-establishment of functional connectivity between the bilateral M1 regions, which facilitate motor signals transmission via the ipsilateral motor pathways from the ipsilesional M1, contralesional M1, to the affected limb. A step-wise linear regression model revealed these two brain reorganization patterns collaboratively contributed to FMA-UL improvement. In conclusion, MT achieved motor rehabilitation primarily by recruitment of the ipsilateral motor pathways. Trial Registration Information: http://www.chictr.org.cn. Unique Identifier. ChiCTR-INR-17013644, submitted on December 2, 2017.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationBrainEfferent PathwaysHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMirror Movement TherapyRecovery of FunctionFractional amplitude of low frequency fluctuationsFunctional connectivityIpsilateral motor pathwaysMirror therapyResting-state fMRI

Identifiers

PMID38262102
PMCPMC10963941
OpenAlexW4391123022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.