ArticleNucleic acids research2024
Cooperativity between Cas9 and hyperactive AID establishes broad and diversifying mutational footprints in base editors.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inducible, split base editors for in vivo cancer functional genomics.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Dissecting the disconnect between circuit activation and dominant adaptive evolution in cytoplasmic phage-assisted continuous evolution (PACE) of an EGFR nanobody.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Sensitive, direct detection of non-coding off-target base editor unwinding and editing in primary cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Toward optimizing diversifying base editors for high-throughput mutational scanning studies.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Targeted mutagenesis of specific genomic DNA sequences in animals for thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Dissecting the mechanism of CRISPR-Cas technologies to design efficient biotechnologies.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2024Article
- APOBEC Reporter Systems for Evaluating diNucleotide Editing Levels.The CRISPR journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The partnership of DNA deaminase enzymes with CRISPR-Cas nucleases is now a well-established method to enable targeted genomic base editing. However, an understanding of how Cas9 and DNA deaminases collaborate to shape base editor (BE) outcomes has been lacking. Here, we support a novel mechanistic model of base editing by deriving a range of hyperactive activation-induced deaminase (AID) base editors (hBEs) and exploiting their characteristic diversifying activity. Our model involves multiple layers of previously underappreciated cooperativity in BE steps including: (i) Cas9 binding can potentially expose both DNA strands for 'capture' by the deaminase, a feature that is enhanced by guide RNA mismatches; (ii) after strand capture, the intrinsic activity of the DNA deaminase can tune window size and base editing efficiency; (iii) Cas9 defines the boundaries of editing on each strand, with deamination blocked by Cas9 binding to either the PAM or the protospacer and (iv) non-canonical edits on the guide RNA bound strand can be further elicited by changing which strand is nicked by Cas9. Leveraging insights from our mechanistic model, we create novel hBEs that can remarkably generate simultaneous C > T and G > A transitions over >65 bp with significant potential for targeted gene diversification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.