Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38261971›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2024

Checkpoint activation by Spd1: a competition-based system relying on tandem disordered PCNA binding motifs.

Johan G Olsen, Andreas Prestel, Noah Kassem, Sebastian S Broendum, Hossain Mohammad Shamim, Signe Simonsen, Martin Grysbæk, Josefine Mortensen, Louise Lund Rytkjær, Gitte W Haxholm and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Johan G OlsenStructural Biology and NMR Laboratory, The Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science and REPIN, Department of Biology, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Andreas PrestelStructural Biology and NMR Laboratory, The Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science and REPIN, Department of Biology, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5459-9608
Noah KassemStructural Biology and NMR Laboratory, The Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science and REPIN, Department of Biology, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Sebastian S BroendumStructural Biology and NMR Laboratory, The Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science and REPIN, Department of Biology, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Hossain Mohammad ShamimCell cycle and Genome Stability Group, Functional Genomics, Department of Biology, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Signe SimonsenStructural Biology and NMR Laboratory, The Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science and REPIN, Department of Biology, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Martin GrysbækCell cycle and Genome Stability Group, Functional Genomics, Department of Biology, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Josefine MortensenCell cycle and Genome Stability Group, Functional Genomics, Department of Biology, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Louise Lund RytkjærCell cycle and Genome Stability Group, Functional Genomics, Department of Biology, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Gitte W HaxholmStructural Biology and NMR Laboratory, The Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science and REPIN, Department of Biology, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Riccardo MarabiniStructural Biology and NMR Laboratory, The Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science and REPIN, Department of Biology, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Christian HolmbergCell cycle and Genome Stability Group, Functional Genomics, Department of Biology, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9224-0543
Antony M CarrGenome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, John Maynard Smith Building, Falmer, BN1 9RQ, Brighton.
Ramon CrehuetInstitute for Advanced Chemistry of Catalonia (IQAC), CSIC, c/ Jordi Girona 18-26, 08034 Barcelona.
Olaf NielsenCell cycle and Genome Stability Group, Functional Genomics, Department of Biology, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7440-5201
Birthe B KragelundStructural Biology and NMR Laboratory, The Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science and REPIN, Department of Biology, Ole Maaloes Vej 5, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7454-1761
University of Copenhagen · DKInstitute of Advanced Chemistry of Catalonia · ESUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

AICR 12-1118Carlsberg FoundationDanish Council for Independent Research Natural Sciences 4181-00344European Synchrotron Radiation FacilityNovo Nordisk Foundation NNF18OC0033926Novo Nordisk ScholarshipStructural Biology and NMR LaboratoryThrond Mohn stiftelsen (TAMiR project)Villumfonden
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA regulation, replication and repair are processes fundamental to all known organisms and the sliding clamp proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is central to all these processes. S-phase delaying protein 1 (Spd1) from S. pombe, an intrinsically disordered protein that causes checkpoint activation by inhibiting the enzyme ribonucleotide reductase, has one of the most divergent PCNA binding motifs known. Using NMR spectroscopy, in vivo assays, X-ray crystallography, calorimetry, and Monte Carlo simulations, an additional PCNA binding motif in Spd1, a PIP-box, is revealed. The two tandemly positioned, low affinity sites exchange rapidly on PCNA exploiting the same binding sites. Increasing or decreasing the binding affinity between Spd1 and PCNA through mutations of either motif compromised the ability of Spd1 to cause checkpoint activation in yeast. These results pinpoint a role for PCNA in Spd1-mediated checkpoint activation and suggest that its tandemly positioned short linear motifs create a neatly balanced competition-based system, involving PCNA, Spd1 and the small ribonucleotide reductase subunit, Suc22R2. Similar mechanisms may be relevant in other PCNA binding ligands where divergent binding motifs so far have gone under the PIP-box radar.

Indexed as

Cell Cycle ProteinsProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsBinding SitesDNA ReplicationIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsProtein BindingRibonucleotide ReductasesSchizosaccharomycesCell Cycle ProteinsIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenRibonucleotide ReductasesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsSpd1 protein, S pombe

Identifiers

PMID38261971
PMCPMC10939359
OpenAlexW4391126337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.