ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology2024
Minimizing the risk of injury to the popliteal artery during pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears: A cadaveric study.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic Positional Changes in the Popliteal Artery and Vastus Medialis and Lateralis Muscles During Knee Flexion and Extension: An Open MRI-Based Anatomical Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Popliteal Artery Injury Risk in Total Knee Arthroplasty Related to Anatomic Variations: A Scoping Review.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the positional effect of guide pins used in the transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears on the popliteal artery. Methods: We used eight cadaveric knees. Two 2.4-mm guide pins were inserted into the posterior root of the medial meniscus at 50° to the articular surface from the medial edge of the tibial tuberosity (anteromedial group) and the anterior edge of the medial collateral ligament (posteromedial group) using an aiming guide placed at the posterior root attachment of the medial meniscus from the anteromedial portal. The posterior capsule was dissected, and the popliteal artery was identified. The positional effect of the guide pins on the popliteal artery was photographed arthroscopically at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° knee flexion angles. The popliteal artery diameter and the minimum distance between the popliteal artery center and the guide pin tip were measured. Results: At 90° knee flexion, most of the guide pins in the anteromedial (6 knees; 75 %) and posteromedial groups (7 knees; 87.5 %) collided with the femoral intercondylar wall. The rate of collision was significantly higher at the 90° knee flexion position than that at other angles (p = 0.02). The average shortest distance between the popliteal artery center and the guide pin tip at 0° knee flexion in the posteromedial group (5.4 mm ± 3.4 mm) was significantly greater than that at other knee flexion angles, although the mean distance in the posteromedial group was so negligible that the guide pin could penetrate the popliteal artery. Conclusions: Knee flexion at 90° causes less damage to the popliteal artery during the transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.