Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38261886›Full record

ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India

Predictors of CPAP failure with RAM cannula interface for primary respiratory support in preterm neonates.

Pradeep Kumar, Anita Yadav, Pratima Anand, Pradeep Debata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. OcclusiveEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pradeep KumarSenior Resident (Pediatrics), Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Anita YadavAssociate Professor (Pediatrics), Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Pratima AnandChief Medical Officer (Pediatrics), Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Pradeep DebataProfessor (Pediatrics), Vardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: RAM cannula is used as interface for delivering nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in many neonatal care units though the bench to bedside evidence for its use in clinical settings in lacking. Methods: In this prospective cohort study from tertiary care neonatal care unit, the primary objective was to determine the rate of CPAP failure using RAM interface, within 72 h of starting of therapy and secondary objective was to look for the incidence and severity of nasal trauma with the use of RAM interface for CPAP delivery. All inborn preterm neonates between 28 and 32 weeks of gestation and weight more than 1000 g who required non-invasive respiratory support within 6 h of life were included in the study. Results: The enroled cohort of 250 neonates had mean gestational age of 30.73 ± 1.32 weeks and mean birth weight of 1410 ± 210 g. CPAP failure rate with the use of RAM interface was 31.2% (78/250) in the overall cohort. The failure rate was higher in subgroup of gestation between 28 and 30 week (52.1%) in comparison with the 31-32-week gestation (18.2%; p-value = 0.0001). Nasal trauma was present in 36 (14%) neonates; of whom 33 (91%) had mild and 2 (6%) and 1 (3%) had moderate and severe, respectively. On multivariate analysis, birth weight less than 1250 g, incomplete antenatal steroids, need for PEEP more than 5 cm & FiO2 > 30% at onset of distress and administration of surfactant were found be statistically significantly associated with CPAP failure with RAM interface. Conclusion: The clinical outcomes with the use of RAM interface for CPAP administration are comparable to those with other interfaces with lesser incidence of nasal injury. The results of this study warrant future randomized trials to compare different CPAP interfaces for clinical outcomes and nasal injuries from the developing countries.

Indexed as

Clinical outcomesContinuous positive airway pressureNeonatesRAM cannula

Identifiers

PMID38261886
PMCPMC10793224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.