ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India
Correlation coefficient between plethysmographic variability index and Systolic Pressure Variation as an indicator for fluid responsiveness in hypotensive patients in the ICU/OT.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prediction of fluid responsiveness in hypotensive patients is a challenge. The correlation between a novel noninvasive dynamic indicator, Pleth Variability Index (PVI ®), and a gold-standard Systolic Pressure Variation (SPV) as a measure of fluid responsiveness was assessed in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or Operation Theatre (OT) in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: A prospective experimental study was conducted over a span of one year on 100 mechanically ventilated patients with hypotension. Vital parameters along with SPV and PVI ® were recorded before and after a standard volume expansion protocol. A 10% SPV threshold was used to define fluid responders and nonresponders. Results: Pearson's correlation graph at baseline showed positive correlation between PVI ® and SPV (r = 0.59, p-value = 0.001). Strength of correlation was comparatively less but still showed positive correlation at 15 (r = 0.39, p-value = 0.009) and 30 (r = 0.404, p-value = 0.004) minutes of fluid bolus. The Bland Altman analysis of baseline values of PVI ® and SPV showed good agreement with a mean bias of 9.05. Percentage change of PVI ® and SPV over 30 min showed a statistically significant positive correlation in the responder group (r = 0.53, p < 0.05). A threshold value of PVI ® more than 18% before volume expansion differentiated fluid responders and nonresponders with a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 67%, with an area under Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) of 0.78. Conclusion: A positive correlation exists between SPV and PVI ®, justifying the use of noninvasive PVI ® in a clinical setting of hypotension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.