ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology
SARC-F Score: A Quick Bedside Tool to Screen Sarcopenia in Patients With Cirrhosis.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Burden of malnutrition and sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis: pathophysiology, assessment, and management.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Review
- Review
- An Indian Consensus on Sarcopenia: Epidemiology, Etiology, Clinical Impact, Screening, and Therapeutic Approaches.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Screening and assessment of malnutrition in patients with liver cirrhosis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sarcopenia is often ignored in clinical practice despite being an important prognostic marker. SARC-F is a simple bedside score to assess muscle abnormalities in cirrhosis patients. However, there is limited Indian data on the validity of this score. Hence, we aimed to assess the validity of SARC-F score in a tertiary care center. Methods: A prospective observational study including consecutive 100 cirrhosis patients attending the gastroenterology outpatient department in Osmania Medical College and Hospital, Hyderabad, India, was conducted from Jan 2018 to Dec 2019. The primary aim was to assess the mean muscle volume loss (MVL) by computed tomography and handgrip (HG) strength for muscle strength decline (MSD) and compare the SARC-F score with standard cut-off values. Results: We included 100 cirrhosis patients (mean age: 45 years; males: 86%; child-pugh class B/C: 42/58). Sixty-nine percent of the patients had a SARC-F score of ≥4, whereas MVL and MSD were noted in 62% and 86% patients, respectively. Mid-arm circumference, skin-fold thickness, mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC), and HG strength were significantly lower in patients with SARC-F score ≥4 than in those with SARC-F score <4 ( Conclusion: SARC-F score has good sensitivity as a bedside screening tool for sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis. A high SARC-F score and low MAMC indicates the presence of MVL and warrants further evaluation for sarcopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.