Multi-indicator comparative evaluation for deep learning-based protein sequence design methods.

motivationProteins found in nature represent only a fraction of the vast space of possible proteins. Protein design presents an opportunity to explore and expand this protein landscape. Within protein design, protein sequence design plays a crucial role, and numerous successful methods have been developed. Notably, deep learning-based protein sequence design methods have experienced significant advancements in recent years. However, a comprehensive and systematic comparison and evaluation of these methods have been lacking, with indicators provided by different methods often inconsistent or lacking effectiveness.

resultsTo address this gap, we have designed a diverse set of indicators that cover several important aspects, including sequence recovery, diversity, root-mean-square deviation of protein structure, secondary structure, and the distribution of polar and nonpolar amino acids. In our evaluation, we have employed an improved weighted inferiority-superiority distance method to comprehensively assess the performance of eight widely used deep learning-based protein sequence design methods. Our evaluation not only provides rankings of these methods but also offers optimization suggestions by analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of each method. Furthermore, we have developed a method to select the best temperature parameter and proposed solutions for the common issue of designing sequences with consecutive repetitive amino acids, which is often encountered in protein design methods. These findings can greatly assist users in selecting suitable protein sequence design methods. Overall, our work contributes to the field of protein sequence design by providing a comprehensive evaluation system and optimization suggestions for different methods.