Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38261621›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Coexistence of many species under a random competition-colonization trade-off.

Zachary R Miller, Maxime Clenet, Katja Della Libera, François Massol, Stefano Allesina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Competition-colonization trade-off can explain any observed abundances and assumed competitive hierarchies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A unifying principle for multispecies coexistence under resource fluctuations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Coexistence of many species under a random competition-colonization trade-off.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zachary R Miller *Department of Ecology & Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.ORCID 0000-0001-9762-8301
Maxime Clenet *Laboratoire d'Informatique Gaspard-Monge, UMR 8049, CNRS, Université Gustave Eiffel, Marne-la-Vallée 77454, France.
Katja Della LiberaDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.
François MassolUniversité Lille, CNRS, INSERM, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019-UMR 9017-Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, Lille F-59000, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4098-955X
Stefano AllesinaDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.ORCID 0000-0003-0313-8374

Funding

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Project 80 Prime - KARATENational Science Foundation (NSF) DGE-1746045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The competition-colonization (CC) trade-off is a well-studied coexistence mechanism for metacommunities. In this setting, it is believed that the coexistence of all species requires their traits to satisfy restrictive conditions limiting their similarity. To investigate whether diverse metacommunities can assemble in a CC trade-off model, we study their assembly from a probabilistic perspective. From a pool of species with parameters (corresponding to traits) sampled at random, we compute the probability that any number of species coexist and characterize the set of species that emerges through assembly. Remarkably, almost exactly half of the species in a large pool typically coexist, with no saturation as the size of the pool grows, and with little dependence on the underlying distribution of traits. Through a mix of analytical results and simulations, we show that this unlimited niche packing emerges as assembly actively moves communities toward overdispersed configurations in niche space. Our findings also apply to a realistic assembly scenario where species invade one at a time from a fixed regional pool. When diversity arises de novo in the metacommunity, richness still grows without bound, but more slowly. Together, our results suggest that the CC trade-off can support the robust emergence of diverse communities, even when coexistence of the full species pool is exceedingly unlikely.

Indexed as

BandagesPhenotypeProbabilitycoexistence theorycommunity assemblycompetition–colonization trade-offmetacommunitiesprobabilistic analysis

Identifiers

PMID38261621
PMCPMC10835059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.