Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38261596›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2024

Killer prey: Ecology reverses bacterial predation.

Marie Vasse, Francesca Fiegna, Ben Kriesel, Gregory J Velicer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Milestones in the development ofJournal of bacteriology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marie VasseMIVEGEC (UMR 5290 CNRS, IRD, UM), CNRS 34394 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4081-6664
Francesca FiegnaInstitute for Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Ben KrieselInstitute for Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Gregory J VelicerInstitute for Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological variation influences the character of many biotic interactions, but examples of predator-prey reversal mediated by abiotic context are few. We show that the temperature at which prey grow before interacting with a bacterial predator can determine the very direction of predation, reversing predator and prey identities. While Pseudomonas fluorescens reared at 32°C was extensively killed by the generalist predator Myxococcus xanthus, P. fluorescens reared at 22°C became the predator, slaughtering M. xanthus to extinction and growing on its remains. Beyond M. xanthus, diffusible molecules in P. fluorescens supernatant also killed 2 other phylogenetically distant species among several examined. Our results suggest that the sign of lethal microbial antagonisms may often change across abiotic gradients in natural microbial communities, with important ecological and evolutionary implications. They also suggest that a larger proportion of microbial warfare results in predation-the killing and consumption of organisms-than is generally recognized.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaMyxococcus xanthusAnimalsAntibiosisBiological EvolutionPredatory Behavior

Identifiers

PMID38261596
PMCPMC10805292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.