Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38261592›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine2024

From static web to metaverse: reinventing medical education in the post-pandemic era.

Kadriye O Lewis, Vitaliy Popov, Syeda Sadia Fatima

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Living publications: How interactive artificial intelligence platforms are transforming research communication.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Review
  12. Rallying for Reflection: Pilot Use of Rubric to Facilitate Self-Reflection in Dental Education.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kadriye O LewisChildren's Mercy Kansas City, Department of Pediatrics, UMKC School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5947-409X
Vitaliy PopovDepartment of Learning Health Sciences, University of MI Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2348-5285
Syeda Sadia FatimaDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-3164-0225

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Wide Web and the advancement of computer technology in the 1960s and 1990s respectively set the ground for a substantial and simultaneous change in many facets of our life, including medicine, health care, and medical education. The traditional didactic approach has shifted towards more dynamic and interactive methods, leveraging technologies such as simulation tools, virtual reality, and online platforms. At the forefront is the remarkable evolution that has revolutionized how medical knowledge is accessed, disseminated, and integrated into pedagogical practices. The COVID-19 pandemic also led to rapid and large-scale adoption of e-learning and digital resources in medical education because of widespread lockdowns, social distancing measures, and the closure of medical schools and healthcare training programs. This review paper examines the evolution of medical education from the Flexnerian era to the modern digital age, closely examining the influence of the evolving WWW and its shift from Education 1.0 to Education 4.0. This evolution has been further accentuated by the transition from the static landscapes of Web 2D to the immersive realms of Web 3D, especially considering the growing notion of the metaverse. The application of the metaverse is an interconnected, virtual shared space that includes virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR) to create a fertile ground for simulation-based training, collaborative learning, and experiential skill acquisition for competency development. This review includes the multifaceted applications of the metaverse in medical education, outlining both its benefits and challenges. Through insightful case studies and examples, it highlights the innovative potential of the metaverse as a platform for immersive learning experiences. Moreover, the review addresses the role of emerging technologies in shaping the post-pandemic future of medical education, ultimately culminating in a series of recommendations tailored for medical institutions aiming to successfully capitalize on revolutionary changes.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalPandemicsEducational StatusHumansInternetLearning2D and 3Daugmented realityeducation 1.0 to education 4.0emerging technologiesevolution of webhealth 1.0 to health 4.0Medical educationmetaversemixed realitystatic webvirtual realityweb 1.0 to web 4.0

Identifiers

PMID38261592
PMCPMC10810636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.