Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38261415›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2024

Identifying epilepsy surgery referral candidates with natural language processing in an Australian context.

Sheryn Tan, Rudy Goh, Jeng Swen Ng, Charis Tang, Cleo Ng, Joshua Kovoor, Brandon Stretton, Aashray Gupta, Christopher Ovenden, Merran R Courtney and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sheryn TanUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8310-0853
Rudy GohUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jeng Swen NgUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Charis TangUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Cleo NgUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Joshua KovoorUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Brandon StrettonUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Aashray GuptaUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Christopher OvendenUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Merran R CourtneyMonash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew NealMonash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9251-5471
Emma WhithamFlinders University and Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Joseph FrascaFlinders University and Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Michelle KileyUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Amal Abou-HamdenUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Stephen BacchiUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Royal Adelaide Hospital · AUThe University of Adelaide · AUFlinders University · AUMonash University · AUGold Coast Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEpilepsy surgery is known to be underutilized. Machine learning-natural language processing (ML-NLP) may be able to assist with identifying patients suitable for referral for epilepsy surgery evaluation.

methodsData were collected from two tertiary hospitals for patients seen in neurology outpatients for whom the diagnosis of "epilepsy" was mentioned. Individual case note review was undertaken to characterize the nature of the diagnoses discussed in these notes, and whether those with epilepsy fulfilled prespecified criteria for epilepsy surgery workup (namely focal drug refractory epilepsy without contraindications). ML-NLP algorithms were then developed using fivefold cross-validation on the first free-text clinic note for each patient to identify these criteria.

resultsThere were 457 notes included in the study, of which 250 patients had epilepsy. There were 37 (14.8%) individuals who fulfilled the prespecified criteria for epilepsy surgery referral without described contraindications, 32 (12.8%) of whom were not referred for epilepsy surgical evaluation in the given clinic visit. In the prediction of suitability for epilepsy surgery workup using the prespecified criteria, the tested models performed similarly. For example, the random forest model returned an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.97 (95% confidence interval 0.93-1.0) for this task, sensitivity of 1.0, and specificity of 0.93. SIGNIFICANCE: This study has shown that there are patients in tertiary hospitals in South Australia who fulfill prespecified criteria for epilepsy surgery evaluation who may not have been referred for such evaluation. ML-NLP may assist with the identification of patients suitable for such referral. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Epilepsy surgery is a beneficial treatment for selected individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy. However, it is vastly underutilized. One reason for this underutilization is a lack of prompt referral of possible epilepsy surgery candidates to comprehensive epilepsy centers. Natural language processing, coupled with machine learning, may be able to identify possible epilepsy surgery candidates through the analysis of unstructured clinic notes. This study, conducted in two tertiary hospitals in South Australia, demonstrated that there are individuals who fulfill criteria for epilepsy surgery evaluation referral but have not yet been referred. Machine learning-natural language processing demonstrates promising results in assisting with the identification of such suitable candidates in Australia.

Indexed as

Drug Resistant EpilepsyEpilepsyAustraliaElectronic Health RecordsHumansNatural Language ProcessingReferral and Consultationdata miningnatural language processingneurosurgeryseizurestext analysis

Identifiers

PMID38261415
PMCPMC10984289
OpenAlexW4391132329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.