ArticleMaternal and child health journal2024
How Much is too Much? High Utilization of Prenatal Care and Its Impact on Primary Cesarean Birth Among Women in the United States.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Association Between Experiencing Racial Discrimination and Delivery Method Among Women in the United States, PRAMS 2016-2021.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNationally, cesarean birth is one of the most performed surgical procedures, yet cesarean births have been linked to an increased risk of delivery complications. Prenatal care (PNC) and education are possible strategies to reduce the number of cesarean births. However, there is scant research assessing the impact of these strategies on safely reducing primary cesarean births. This study evaluates the association between the adequacy of PNC utilization and primary cesarean birth.
methodsThe analysis used 2018 birth certificate data, and the sample included nulliparous women with no reported pregnancy or delivery complications (N = 729,140). Logistic regression was used to model the association between the adequacy of PNC utilization and delivery method, as well as identify other factors associated with the delivery method.
resultsAmong women with a primary cesarean birth, 36.2% had received adequate plus PNC. After adjustment, there was no significant association between women receiving inadequate, intermediate, or adequate PNC and primary cesarean birth. However, women who received adequate plus PNC had an increased odds of having a primary cesarean birth compared to women with no PNC (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.18-1.28). DISCUSSION: Findings from this study highlight the need to further understand the role of PNC and its potential impact on the delivery method. Within the patient-provider relationship, healthcare providers have the unique opportunity to provide education and inform patients of the risks and benefits of all delivery options. Thus, there is an increased opportunity to safely reduce primary cesarean births.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38261276What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.