Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38261143›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2024

Adjuvant convection-enhanced delivery for the treatment of brain tumors.

Daniel Kreatsoulas, Mark Damante, Santino Cua, Russell R Lonser

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Protocols and safety profile of convection enhanced delivery in pediatric patients: a systematic review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Auger electron-emitting EGFR-targeted and non-targeted [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Common AAV gene therapy vectors show nonselective transduction ofMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel KreatsoulasDepartment of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, N1019 Doan Hall, 410 W 10Th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. daniel.kreatsoulas@osumc.edu.
Mark DamanteDepartment of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, N1019 Doan Hall, 410 W 10Th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Santino CuaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, N1019 Doan Hall, 410 W 10Th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Russell R LonserDepartment of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, N1019 Doan Hall, 410 W 10Th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalignant gliomas are a therapeutic challenge and remain nearly uniformly fatal. While new targeted chemotherapeutic agentsagainst malignant glioma have been developed in vitro, these putative therapeutics have not been translated into successful clinical treatments. The lack of clinical effectiveness can be the result of ineffective biologic strategies, heterogeneous tumor targets and/or the result of poortherapeutic distribution to malignant glioma cells using conventional nervous system delivery modalities (intravascular, cerebrospinal fluid and/orpolymer implantation), and/or ineffective biologic strategies.

methodsThe authors performed a review of the literature for the terms "convection enhanced delivery", "glioblastoma", and "glioma". Selectclinical trials were summarized based on their various biological mechanisms and technological innovation, focusing on more recently publisheddata when possible.

resultsWe describe the properties, features and landmark clinical trials associated with convection-enhanced delivery for malignant gliomas.We also discuss future trends that will be vital to CED innovation and improvement.

conclusionEfficacy of CED for malignant glioma to date has been mixed, but improvements in technology and therapeutic agents arepromising.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiological ProductsBrain NeoplasmsGliomaConvectionDrug Delivery SystemsHumansAntineoplastic AgentsBiological ProductsAdjuvantConvection-enhanced deliveryGlioblastomaGliomaTreatment

Identifiers

PMID38261143
PMCPMC10834622
OpenAlexW4391141121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.