Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38261142›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2024

MRI Treatment Response Assessment Maps (TRAMs) for differentiating recurrent glioblastoma from radiation necrosis.

Sebastian Johannes Müller, Eya Khadhraoui, Oliver Ganslandt, Hans Henkes, Georg Alexander Gihr

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sebastian Johannes MüllerKlinik Für Neuroradiologie, Klinikum-Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstr. 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany. sebastian.j.mueller@googlemail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2147-9797
Eya KhadhraouiKlinik Für Neuroradiologie, Klinikum-Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstr. 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.
Oliver GanslandtAbteilung Für Neurochirurgie, Klinikum-Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Hans HenkesKlinik Für Neuroradiologie, Klinikum-Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstr. 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.
Georg Alexander GihrKlinik Für Neuroradiologie, Klinikum-Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstr. 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.
Klinikum Stuttgart · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMRI treatment response assessment maps (TRAMs) were introduced to distinguish recurrent malignant glioma from therapy related changes. TRAMs are calculated with two contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences and reflect the "late" wash-out (or contrast clearance) and wash-in of gadolinium. Vital tumor cells are assumed to produce a wash-out because of their high turnover rate and the associated hypervascularization, whereas contrast medium slowly accumulates in scar tissue. To examine the real value of this method, we compared TRAMs with the pathology findings obtained after a second biopsy or surgery when recurrence was suspected.

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated TRAMs in adult patients with histologically demonstrated glioblastoma, contrast-enhancing tissue and a pre-operative MRI between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022. Only patients with a second biopsy or surgery were evaluated. Volumes of the residual tumor, contrast clearance and contrast accumulation before the second surgery were analyzed.

resultsAmong 339 patients with mGBM who underwent MRI, we identified 29 repeated surgeries/biopsies in 27 patients 59 ± 12 (mean ± standard deviation) years of age. Twenty-eight biopsies were from patients with recurrent glioblastoma histology, and only one was from a patient with radiation necrosis. We volumetrically evaluated the 29 pre-surgery TRAMs. In recurrent glioblastoma, the ratio of wash-out volume to tumor volume was 36 ± 17% (range 1-73%), and the ratio of the wash-out volume to the sum of wash-out and wash-in volumes was 48 ± 21% (range 22-92%). For the one biopsy with radiation necrosis, the ratios were 42% and 54%, respectively.

conclusionsTypical recurrent glioblastoma shows a > 20%ratio of the wash-out volume to the sum of wash-out and wash-in volumes. The one biopsy with radiation necrosis indicated that such necrosis can also produce high wash-out in individual cases. Nevertheless, the additional information provided by TRAMs increases the reliability of diagnosis.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaAdultContrast MediaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNecrosisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaRadiation necrosisRecurrent glioblastomaTherapy monitoringTRAMs

Identifiers

PMID38261142
OpenAlexW4391142720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.